Search for: "Plaintiffs plaintiffs" Results 121 - 140 of 204,232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2007, 9:13 am
  Holding:  plaintiff is collaterally estopped from suing.Hinshaw reports: "J. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 5:33 am by Peter
Dionee Searcy of the Wall Street Journal law blog reports about a recent 9th Circuit ruling that held that plaintiff lawyers could deduct as ordinary and necessary expenses the costs they advance for their plaintiff clients: The court “held that attorneys who represent clients in contingency fee cases may treat litigation costs that are paid by [...] [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 7:31 am by Docket Navigator
"The Court orders [plaintiff's Rule 30(b)(6) witness] to submit to a deposition in Texarkana under the supervision of [the special master] on topics related to [plaintiff's] knowledge of the [license agreements] only recently produced, despite [plaintiff's] false representation to Interrogatory No. 13 directed to license agreements; [plaintiff's] decision to assert the disputed patents despite its lack of standing;… [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 7:01 am by Seth Leventhal
”)  Plaintiffs had two theories, both of which the Court (U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 12:26 pm by Asbestos Legal Center
Bestwall bankruptcy judge holds asbestos plaintiffs in contempt for failing to submit questionnaires ASBESTOS ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY Continue reading [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:39 pm by Charles Bieneman
The defendant argued that the plaintiff lacked standing to sue for acts of infringement occurring prior to March 29, 2010, the date on which the plaintiff was assigned rights to the patent-in-suit. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 12:02 pm by Ezra Rosser
New Article: Daniel Wilf-Townsend, Assembly-Line Plaintiffs, forthcoming Harv. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:40 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
During a jury trial, plaintiff, defendant, plaintiff’s doctor, and the police officer who responded to the accident testified. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 8:48 am by MorelliRatner
Several state and federal courts have now ruled that plaintiffs may in fact take the manufacturer to court. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 10:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It accepts that plaintiff's performance was deficient and that plaintiff could not poke holes in that factual argument:Defendant submitted evidence -- essentially undisputed by plaintiff -- of a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for firing plaintiff. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:37 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The opt-in plaintiffs’ claims were dismissed without prejudice and the  named plaintiffs’ claims were dismissed with prejudice. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 12:13 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
  According to the filings in the matter, the plaintiff argued the insurer had not identified any public information on the plaintiff's Facebook site, relevant to the case or not, that would trigger a right to further discovery. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Addressing Plaintiff's retaliation claim, the Circuit Court concluded "[on] this record, no reasonable jury could find that Plaintiff engaged in protected activity. [read post]