Search for: "Pooler v State" Results 121 - 140 of 307
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2015, 8:51 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It took the Court of Appeals 2.5 years to reach a decision in this case, holding in a 2-1 vote that the State of New York can regulate this speech.The case is Children First Foundation v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 7:13 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The case was dismissed on summary judgment, but the Court of Appeals revives plaintiff's due process claim.The case is Victory v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:46 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals has granted a Habeas Corpus petition filed by a man who was found guilty in 1993 for killing his former girlfriend, ruling that his attorney did not effectively represent him at trial.The case is Rivas v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 12:34 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals affirms the verdict.The case is Mulholland v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 9:21 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says the plaintiff can sue these fellas under Section 1983.The case is Gleason v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:05 am
Now Online at BrokeAndBroker.com:FULL-TEXT Second Circuit Opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:28 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
A portion of that law that regulates the centers' speech violates the First AmendmentThe case is The Evergreen Association v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:48 am by Joy Waltemath
The appeals court, however, affirmed the lower court’s dismissal of the employee’s claims against several private equity investors (Guippone v BH S&B Holdings LLC, December 10, 2013, Pooler, R). [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:00 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
With exquisite timing, the Court of Appeals lays it out for us.The case is United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:22 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals reverses because the district court had no jurisdiction over the state law claim.The case is Carver v. [read post]