Search for: "Poore v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 6,219
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2023, 12:33 pm
From Richwine v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:11 pm
In State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Part of the GGC’s stated vision during the election was support for “evidence-based” governance. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:21 am
(Cohen, v. 2, p. 9.) [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:22 pm
"District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm
United States, Dred Scott v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Mercantile Exch., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Mercantile Exch., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:16 am
It’s therefore troubling that it did such a poor job of it. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm
In addition to monthly estimates of the number of facility-based abortions provided in each state from January through September 2023, this release includes the first comprehensive data measuring the magnitude of interstate travel for abortion after the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 9:55 am
By invoking a later Lochner-era case, Eisner v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 1:42 am
Another significant legal battle involving murals and VARA unfolded in the case of Kerson v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 2:25 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
In MCAD v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:55 am
Another example is Google’s $5 billion lawsuit for tracking users’ incognito sessions in Brown v Google LLC. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:22 am
Civil rights law in the US is completely dead unless you’re not brown or poor. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
In a judgement of 26 July 2022, Nicklin J held that the defamatory meaning was that the Claimant was a hypocrite who had screwed the country and set a poor moral example to young people ([2022] EWHC 2469 (QB)). [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Harrow v. [read post]
