Search for: "Posner v. Posner" Results 121 - 140 of 1,906
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2012, 10:27 am by David Lat
Professor Garner is NOT happy with Judge Posner’s review of Scalia and Garner’s new book. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 12:06 pm
The plaintiffs in Ritchie (Know Mind Enterprises/Topco) v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 4:57 am
Via the Suits and Sentences Blog (HT: How Appealing), we see a summary of a recent Judge Posner opinion about the growing problems created by "private entrapment":  But the really intriguing part of United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 6:05 am
For this third and penultimate entry in my series of posts on Jones v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 2:17 pm
Providing a nice counter-point to what I considered troublesome work last week in Boyd (discussed here and here and here), Judge Posner today in US v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 5:46 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
" Very little in the way of case law helps us figure out a uniform test, despite the fact the Trade Secrets Act is a uniform act adopted everywhere now but New York, Massachusetts, and Texas.It is appropriate, therefore, to look elsewhere, including Judge Posner's opinion in Nightingale Home Healthcare, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:31 pm
 And yet our patience has lately improved.Judge Richard Posner helped today by explaining, in an ironically long opinion for him, why judicial sound bites can make bad law. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:53 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Eric Posner has spent much of the last decade criticizing the liberal legal response to post-9/11 government policies. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 8:20 am by Marcia Oddi
Updating yesterday's ILB summary of Judge Posner's opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 12:07 pm by Florian Mueller
In yesterday's post on Google's opening brief in the appeal of Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 8:30 pm
In the current issue of The New Republic, Senior Lecturer Richard Posner has published an article in which he discusses the repercussions of the Supreme Court's recent decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]