Search for: "Potter v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 325
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am
The agency also approved of a second set of regulations in the form of an interim final rule responding to the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:02 am
In 1967, President Johnson nominated him to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:51 am
” This question is reminiscent of the challenge to the United States Supreme Court in defining obscenity and Justice Potter Stewart’s concurring opinion when he acknowledged the difficulty of articulating a standard, writing “I know it when I see it”, and then concluding that the movie in question was not obscene. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:24 am
Automated Solutions Corporation v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
United States (1971) and United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 11:00 pm
The Court of Appeal in the case of Arewa Textiles Plc & Others v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
” Smith relied on an earlier case, United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 9:07 am
United States, involving another do-gooder, this time in Burlington, Vermont, trying to convert an old railbed to a recreational trail. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
Brennan, Thurgood Marshall and Potter Stewart. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 5:46 am
Phelps), and false claims to possess the Medal of Honor (United States v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 5:34 am
The district court explained the background of the patent as follows: In 1998, United States patent number 5,729,659 (the '659 patent) was issued to Jerry L. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
Animal lovers will be relieved to hear that, despite Ron and Doby engaging in a little wrestling, the American Humane Association (AHA) stated in the film’s credits that:“No Animals Were Harmed In The Making Of This FilmTM”This post examines whether trade mark rights can be claimed in slogans and considers the AHA's prospects of success in registering this one in the United Kingdom or elsewhere in the European Union.Can trade mark rights be claimed in a… [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Oct. 17, 13 Employment Law: Termination Was the Appellant constructively dismissed.David Potter v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Capital punishment in the United States is often considered in terms of its constitutional vulnerability. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:41 am
Case scheduled Dec 04, 2013 10:00 a.m. at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Howard T. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:34 pm
Bill Neuman wrote yet another article on cheese – “Raw Milk Cheesemakers Fret Over Possible New Rules” – after Food Safety News reported it and in follow-up to my five part series on raw milk and the “60 day rule” – Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5, and the continuing outbreaks, illnesses and recalls linked to raw (unpasteurized) and pasteurized dairy products in the United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:37 am
The decision, Cassotto v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:43 am
United States, No. 2012-5130 (July 18, 2013), it all starts out seeming so simple. [read post]
