Search for: "Powers v. Common Council"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,348
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2009, 12:14 pm
Glasgow City Council v Mitchell [2009] UKHL 11 This is a Scottish appeal to the House of Lords on the scope of the duties owed - if any - by landlords in respect of the behavior of their tenants. [read post]
19 May 2021, 12:34 pm
The city council can require improvements to the use policy. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:01 am
Secondly, and more ambitiously still, the Appellants seek to strike down the 2009 Act on the common law grounds that it was an unreasonable, arbitrary and irrational exercise of the legislative power. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:57 am
The General Dental Council v Savery and others [2011] EWHC 3011 (Admin) – Read judgment Mr Justice Sales in the High Court has ruled that the General Dental Council’s (GDC) use and disclosure of the dental records of fourteen patients of a registered dentist who was the subject of investigation was lawful. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
He says the Inner House has looked at purpose and the propriety of that purpose. 14:44: Lady Hale rasies a point asking whether the example was perhaps showing that the House of Commons was raising objection against the House of Lords which was at that stage hereditory. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
“”Logic and common sense” suggest that had Parliame [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
“”Logic and common sense” suggest that had Parliame [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 3:14 am
Sections 168 and 169 of the 2015 Act substantially codify the common law principles concerning the courts’ powers relating to costs in civil proceedings (Word Perfect Translation v Minister for Public Expenditure & Reform (No 2) [2021] IESC 19 (24 March 2021) [4.2] (Clarke CJ; O’Donnell, MacMenamin, Dunne and O’Malley JJ concurring); in particular, section 169 provides for the traditional rule that costs follow the event. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 7:25 am
Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 7:25 am
Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:06 am
Indeed, the case may be seen as one prong of a multi-faceted push to democratize the power that remains concentrated in an outdated and unrepresentative Security Council. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:44 am
Following this tragic event, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe adopted Resolution 1165 (1998) on the right to privacy. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 3:25 pm
A House of Commons Committee examining Disinformation and Fake News has also touched on the topic. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 6:56 am
Natural Resources Defense Council. [read post]
22 May 2010, 6:12 am
A secure tenant could abandon or withdraw application for right to buy otherwise than by service of written notice under s.122(3) - Copping v Surrey County Council [2006] HLR 307 - or may "abandon or waive his right to buy under normal principles of common law and equity or may be estopped from continuing to exercise it", Martin v Medina Housing Association Ltd [2006] HLR 763. [read post]
22 May 2010, 6:12 am
A secure tenant could abandon or withdraw application for right to buy otherwise than by service of written notice under s.122(3) - Copping v Surrey County Council [2006] HLR 307 - or may "abandon or waive his right to buy under normal principles of common law and equity or may be estopped from continuing to exercise it", Martin v Medina Housing Association Ltd [2006] HLR 763. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 12:22 pm
Laws LJ explained why in Marshalls Clay Products Ltd v Caulfield, Clarke v Frank Staddon Ltd [2004] ICR 1502 at [32]: The rules of precedent or stare decisis cognisable here are given by the common law . . . [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 10:00 pm
Regina v Budimir and another; Interfact Ltd v Liverpool City Council [2010] EWCA Crim 148; [2010] EWHC 1604 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 166 CA and DC: Lord Judge CJ, David Clarke, Lloyd Jones JJ: 29 June 2010 – read judgment A new High Court decision has struck a blow for legal certainty and enforced the sometimes forgotten right under human rights law against retrospective criminal sanctions, which applies even in cases where the UK had failed to enact European… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Gateway (a) is where it is seriously arguable that the law that enables the court to make the possession order is incompatible with art.8 Gateway (b) is where it is seriously arguable that the decision of a public authority to recover possession is an improper exercise of its powers at common law on the ground that it is a decision that no reasonable person would consider justifiable. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Gateway (a) is where it is seriously arguable that the law that enables the court to make the possession order is incompatible with art.8 Gateway (b) is where it is seriously arguable that the decision of a public authority to recover possession is an improper exercise of its powers at common law on the ground that it is a decision that no reasonable person would consider justifiable. [read post]
