Search for: "Precision Process, Inc. v Smith"
Results 121 - 135
of 135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
” In Canada, Southin J. in the British Columbia Supreme Court noted in 1986 that “the proclamation of the Charter [of Rights and Freedoms] by a process worthy of an alchemist, has transformed judges from lawyers into philosopher kings…”[21] In light of these views, one might expect that the explicit mention of philosophers would occur most frequently in the context of constitutional law. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 3:17 pm
[8] The second possibility is that a formerly non-generic mark may become generic over time through evolving public usage, a process known as genericide. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm
Several of the protocols, though, do provide very precise instructions about how to use the technology the court will be employing. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:56 am
Beginning with Ab-Tech Cons., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
X v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:51 am
Smith, 714 So. 2d 652, 654 (Fla. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: YouTube – Prince demands removal of song from YouTube, Radiohead demand it is put back online: (Techdirt), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (The Trademark Blog), Japan planning fair use provision: (Michael Geist), (Techdirt), (IP Justice), (Patry Copyright Blog), Judge rejects Yoko Ono’s request for preliminary injunction… [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
From Wednesday's California Court of Appeal decision in Firefighters4Freedom v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Partnership for New York City, Inc., amicus curiae. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
Kehm v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
The European Parliament's shadow rapporteur Dietmar Köster said "The reform of copyright also concerns linguistic precision - a distinction should be made between Anglo-American copyright and continental European authors' rights. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine notes that Unocal’s board met for eight or nine hours to consider Pickens’ offer — a response to Smith v. [read post]
