Search for: "Press v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 17,210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2007, 10:08 am
From his comments, I see no evidence that he has in fact read the Second Circuit’s AFSCME v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 5:56 pm by Bryn Miller
MARTIN SAN FRANCISCO, December 16 – Today, the United States Supreme Court declined to review City of Boise v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 10:03 am by Bridget Crawford
United States: Blog Resource and Film AnnouncementFilmmakers April Hayes and Katia Maguire are in the process of producing Jessica Gonzales v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 7:21 am
Background check industry groups have mounted a full-court press to remedy the recent slowdown in criminal record searches in California state courts caused by last year’s court of appeal decision in All of Us or None v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
 The complaint (full text) in American Center for Law & Justice v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
For judgment, please download: [2017] UKSC 62 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII To watch the hearing, please visit: Supreme Court Website (6 Jun 2017 afternoon session) (7 Jun 2017 morning session) (7 Jun 2017 afternoon session) (8 Jun 2017 morning session) [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
For judgment, please download: [2013] UKSC 72 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: Patel & Ors v SSHD, Anwar v SSHD, and Alam v SSHD [2013] UKSC 72 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
For judgment, please download: [2013] UKSC 72 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: Patel & Ors v SSHD, Anwar v SSHD, and Alam v SSHD [2013] UKSC 72 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:21 am by Robbie Stern
In X (South Yorkshire) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 2954 (Admin), the Divisional Court declared that the Guidance was unlawful insofar as it did not require the decision maker to consider whether to invite the subject to make representations. [read post]