Search for: "Price v. Cohen" Results 121 - 140 of 266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2009, 7:13 pm by legaleaseckut
 The song references the famous tort case Donoghue v Stevenson. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 8:27 am by Terry Hart
This past March, the Supreme Court considered in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 4:01 am by Peter Mahler
Jacobs of the Delaware Court of Chancery (currently serving as a Justice of the Delaware Supreme Court), is Fulk v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Party documents say: we intend to raise prices 25%. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 11:54 am
 Joe Cohen (Collyer Bristow LLP), who has long taken a keen interest in IP enforcement issues, has treated us to the following news, with some contextual explanation to accompany it. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statement since our last Round Up: 04322-21 Ruayrungruang v The Sunday Telegraph, 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 04302-21 Lovatt v The National, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 03315-21 Ruayrungruang v The Daily Telegraph, 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 00798-21 Reynolds v The Daily Telegraph, 1… [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:11 am by Chuck Ramsay
Baker, Stephen Johnson, Dennis Price, John Bartolomei, Luis Jones, Robert Price, Tom Bartscher, Joy Kaess, Ryan Rainville, Peter … [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Shareholders were represented by co-lead counsel firms Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll. 2.) [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:55 pm by Ray Dowd
Attorney Sharon Cohen Levin, for their unstinting dedication to the pursuit of justice during the long course of this litigation. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
  Former Vice Chancellor Steele of the Delaware Court of Chancery, in a case called Gilbert v. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  Nicklin J ruled that the reports meant that the claimant had “procured or authorised a corrupt payment of $400,000 to be made to Michael Cohen, the personal lawyer of Donald Trump, to extend a brief meeting between the claimant and President Trump… into more substantial talks”. [read post]