Search for: "Prince v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 484
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2023, 8:00 am by Devin Ricci
Images from Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States.On June 8, 2023, the United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of Jack Daniels in the case of Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 4:27 am by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
 Nick Buckland (Irwin Mitchell) tells all.* Letter from AmeriKat: Remember fair use before issuing DMCA notices, warns Ninth CircuitAnnsley takes a gander at a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the famous case Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that acquired distinctiveness requires that… [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:57 pm
 At issue in Lenz v Universal Music is a 29 second video of the plaintiff, Stephanie Lenz's young children dancing to Prince's "Let's Go Crazy". [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm by Thomas James
They do not extend to infringement occurring solely outside of the United States, even if consumer confusion occurs in the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:28 am by Will Baude
Shortly after the founding, the United States created a corporation called the Bank of the United States, famously discussed in McCulloch v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am by INFORRM
The biggest story in the world this week was of course the election of Donald Trump as the next President of the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
As Canada begins to settle in with the new “notice and notice” provisions under the Copyright Act (Canada) which came into force January 2, 2015 copyright owners in Canada still need to address infringing content posted on websites hosted in the United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
Animal rights organisation People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has taken legal action in the United States on the monkey’s behalf (apparently named Naruto), claiming that the animal owns the copyright in the successful photographs and should therefore reap the benefits financially. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:38 pm
The requirement of authentication is thus a condition precedent to admitting evidence” (United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 3:01 am by jonathanturley
Environmental Protection Agency: A challenge to the test for what is considered “water of the United States. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:47 am by Cindy Cohn
United States: When the United States Supreme Court quotes you in upholding privacy, that’s a big win. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 8:56 pm by Orin Kerr
I don’t know of any opinions by that court that were published, although there’s a reference to the court in passing in the Reporter’s summary of the procedural history of United States v. [read post]