Search for: "Prior v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 48,039
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
Although she had previously heard the door "crack" as it opened fully against the wall, plaintiff had never noticed any problems with the door, complained about it, or heard of any incidents involving the door.Defendants met their initial burden to establish that they neither created nor had actual notice of the alleged defect by submitting the testimony of their custodian engineer that there were no prior repairs, complaints, or prior accidents involving the door that… [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
Although she had previously heard the door "crack" as it opened fully against the wall, plaintiff had never noticed any problems with the door, complained about it, or heard of any incidents involving the door.Defendants met their initial burden to establish that they neither created nor had actual notice of the alleged defect by submitting the testimony of their custodian engineer that there were no prior repairs, complaints, or prior accidents involving the door that… [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:51 am
Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
In Sohm v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:03 pm
In Popa v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:59 am
When asked to describe the impact, the employee stated, “[v]ery light, not harsh at all,” and said he hit the plaintiff with his shoulder. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:15 am
Prior to the Order, only carriers offering voice telephony service could be designated as an ETC. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
In Bissonnette v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 1:59 pm
The Court later defined prior restraint limits in the New York Times v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
X Corp. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:41 am
It also found that the proxy statement failed to disclose the first advisor’s fees for prior work for members of Nordic’s equity consortium, which amounted to nearly $400 million in the relevant two-year period. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:50 am
Finally, it’s hard not to conclude that the protracted history of prior litigations may have had an impact upon the decision. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:07 am
Marital Misconduct and Post-Separation Support This issue was one of a few legal points discussed in the appeals case of Evans v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:42 pm
VILER, Appellants, v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 11:54 am
Last year, the state court ruled in favor of the 16 youth plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am
General guidance on confidentiality: the Fujifilm v Kodak decision, LD Düsseldorf, UPC_CFI_355/2023, 27 March 2024 In these proceedings, the defence to infringement was based on a prior use argument deriving from an acquisition in 2017. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:43 pm
Our article on the same, “Hilltop Group, Inc. v. [read post]
