Search for: "Property Damage Appraisers Inc" Results 121 - 140 of 220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2012, 10:57 am by Matthew Bush
The Dormitory Authority of New YorkDocket: 11-922Issue(s): (1) Whether the Fifth Amendment permits a state to deny compensation to an owner for loss of the reasonably probable development potential of a condemned development site taken through eminent domain proceedings, unless the property owner can show that development will come to fruition in the near future; (2) whether, in awarding just compensation under the Fifth Amendment, a state may exclude damages resulting from… [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Realty, Inc. v Kisslev-Mazel Realty, LLC, 76 AD3d 661, 664 [2010]), and a purchaser who, having failed to perform due diligence as to the condition of property prior to signing a contract that provides for the sale of real property in "as is" condition, [*3]is bound by the contract despite structural deficiencies she may later discover in the property (see Daly v Kochanowicz, 67 AD3d 78 [2009]). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
On remand, the trial court again entered judgment for First Industrial for damage to the residue of the property. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
 The plaintiffs also alleged that a tornado on May 10, 2008, damaged many homes in Picher, Oklahoma, and the Trust improperly reduced payments under the buyout by the amount paid by homeowner’s insurers for property claims. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:07 pm
So, what I would propose ... is that the property be set aside subject to rights of any adverse claimant to the property to litigate the issue of title to those properties. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In January 2019, Petrokansky allegedly arranged for two appraisals for the Property; Viscusi completed the second appraisal (id., ¶ 131). [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 1:59 pm by Bill Ward
In addition, the property owners may claim damages pursuant to N.J.S.A. 20:3-24. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:06 am by Don Cruse
The Texas Supreme Court answered that this did not qualify under the policy’s provision covering “bodily injury” or “property damage. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 11:33 am
 Here, both the defendant’s appraiser and the plaintiff’s appraiser found that the market value had been “massively diminished” due to the wetlands. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 11:33 am
 Here, both the defendant’s appraiser and the plaintiff’s appraiser found that the market value had been “massively diminished” due to the wetlands. [read post]