Search for: "Public Defender of the State of Delaware" Results 121 - 140 of 1,527
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2011, 7:30 am by Robert Vrana
The court also stated that “because [the defendant] is a Delaware corporation, it has no reason to complain about being sued in Delaware” and noted that it was not “persuaded by [the defendant’s] arguments regarding convenience. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:37 pm by Steve Bainbridge
The insider trading prohibition originated in state corporate law, however, and the state rules remain on the books. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:36 am by Gregory J. Brodzik
Defendant “does not have employees, documents or places of business in Delaware,” and “none of [its] accused products were designed or manufactured in Delaware. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 6:15 am by Adam Santucci
The Township defended the claim and argued that union affiliation is not a matter of public concern, and therefore not protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 1:15 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Verizon and the other defendants defended the U.S. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Plaintiff UHS Delaware sued United Health Services, Inc., and related defendants for trademark infringement under §32 and unfair competition under §43(a), and related state claims. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 12:11 pm by Robert B. Milligan
 Notable here is Judge Koh’s insistence that plaintiff  concretely demonstrate that transferring this case to a Delaware court would contravene California public policy. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 5:50 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
" Confidentiality of Court Documents and Proceedings in General VC Laster said that efforts to keep data and court proceedings confidential, must overcome the presumption in the Delaware state constitution that court proceedings are open to the public. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 7:19 pm by Francis Pileggi
This post was prepared by Frank Reynolds, who has been following Delaware corporate law, and writing about it for various legal publications, for over 30 years. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 5:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” The amended release still encompassed “any claims arising under federal, state, statutory, regulatory or common law, or other law or rule. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:01 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The defendants then sought to dismiss the Delaware actions, arguing that the Arkansas decision collaterally estopped the Delaware plaintiffs from alleging demand futility. [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:44 am by William C. Martinez
., the United States District Court for the District of Delaware granted in part Amazon Web Services (“Amazon”) and Pindrop Security’s (“Pindrop”) motion to dismiss a proposed class action brought pursuant to BIPA for lack of standing, based on a strict interpretation of the definitions of “biometric identifiers” and “biometric information” and the plaintiffs’ failure to adequately allege that they suffered any concrete,… [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:44 am by William C. Martinez
., the United States District Court for the District of Delaware granted in part Amazon Web Services (“Amazon”) and Pindrop Security’s (“Pindrop”) motion to dismiss a proposed class action brought pursuant to BIPA for lack of standing, based on a strict interpretation of the definitions of “biometric identifiers” and “biometric information” and the plaintiffs’ failure to adequately allege that they suffered any concrete,… [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:44 am by William C. Martinez
., the United States District Court for the District of Delaware granted in part Amazon Web Services (“Amazon”) and Pindrop Security’s (“Pindrop”) motion to dismiss a proposed class action brought pursuant to BIPA for lack of standing, based on a strict interpretation of the definitions of “biometric identifiers” and “biometric information” and the plaintiffs’ failure to adequately allege that they suffered any concrete,… [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 5:15 am
"  This was, of course, an argument used by some academics and, apparently, Delaware judges, to demonstrate the deplorable state of governance and the excessive costs, particularly those flowing from SOX. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 11:47 am by CJLF Staff
State of Delaware, the Public Defender's Officer argues that the state's death penalty statute contradicts the right to a jury trial, while the Department of Justice contends that the law does not violate the U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm by Edward M. McNally
The defendants then moved to also dismiss the Delaware UFCW complaint, arguing it was precluded by the dismissal of the California case. [read post]