Search for: "Public Defender of the State of Delaware" Results 121 - 140 of 1,536
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Publications that print or post trivial, unimportant, simplistic, or old news are dying. [read post]
9 May 2023, 7:23 am by Holly
  ​Although Delaware courts are known to respect freedom of contract, under certain limited circumstances, such as when a contract violates public policy, Delaware courts will not enforce contractual obligations, no matter how clear or sincerely intended when executed. [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:44 am by William C. Martinez
., the United States District Court for the District of Delaware granted in part Amazon Web Services (“Amazon”) and Pindrop Security’s (“Pindrop”) motion to dismiss a proposed class action brought pursuant to BIPA for lack of standing, based on a strict interpretation of the definitions of “biometric identifiers” and “biometric information” and the plaintiffs’ failure to adequately allege that they suffered any concrete,… [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:44 am by William C. Martinez
., the United States District Court for the District of Delaware granted in part Amazon Web Services (“Amazon”) and Pindrop Security’s (“Pindrop”) motion to dismiss a proposed class action brought pursuant to BIPA for lack of standing, based on a strict interpretation of the definitions of “biometric identifiers” and “biometric information” and the plaintiffs’ failure to adequately allege that they suffered any concrete,… [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:44 am by William C. Martinez
., the United States District Court for the District of Delaware granted in part Amazon Web Services (“Amazon”) and Pindrop Security’s (“Pindrop”) motion to dismiss a proposed class action brought pursuant to BIPA for lack of standing, based on a strict interpretation of the definitions of “biometric identifiers” and “biometric information” and the plaintiffs’ failure to adequately allege that they suffered any concrete,… [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:41 am by Samuel I. Portnoy
The 1933 Act claims were dismissed because the defendant reasonably believed all investors were accredited and for insufficient evidence of any broad public offering. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:41 am by Samuel I. Portnoy
The 1933 Act claims were dismissed because the defendant reasonably believed all investors were accredited and for insufficient evidence of any broad public offering. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:41 am by Samuel I. Portnoy
The 1933 Act claims were dismissed because the defendant reasonably believed all investors were accredited and for insufficient evidence of any broad public offering. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
” Transaction-Specific Inside Information This refers to material non-public information about a prospective transaction that the issuer intends to undertake. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Does it matter that defamation is in fact criminal in 24 U.S. states? [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 7:51 am by Quinta Jurecic
” When Americans think of defamation litigation in connection with preserving democracy, they often think of the importance of defending journalists or members of the public from defamation suits meant to shut them up. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:45 am by Laurence H. Tribe
” Now the Delaware state court has decisively ruled that the statements at issue in the case are false. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 12:31 pm by Kevin LaCroix
According to the recently filed Delaware state court complaint, shortly after the merger was completed, a “negative sequence of events rapidly unfolded that revealed the truth” and the extent to which the defendants’ financial conflicts inflicted the board’s decision making. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 10:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
In the latest example of this Delaware state court litigation activity, plaintiff shareholders recently filed a Delaware Chancery Court lawsuit against the directors of a SPAC; the post-merger de-SPAC company, as successor in interest in the SPAC; and the SPAC’s sponsor, alleging that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the merger. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Unknown
The one-party consent states that ban such recordings are Delaware, Illinois, Oregon, and Vermont. [read post]