Search for: "Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation"
Results 121 - 140
of 290
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2019, 12:41 pm
It's been little more than six months since Apple and Qualcomm's settlement during opening statements in their San Diego FRAND/antitrust litigation. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 7:09 am
Qualcomm decision from the perspective of whether a similar outcome would be possible under EU antitrust law.Rafał Sikorski is a professor of law (with a focus on IP as well as competition law) at Adam Mickiewicz University (Poznan, Poland) and a senior partner at SMM Legal. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 10:28 am
" And he then mentioned the recent decision of the DOJ Antitrust Division, under Antitrust Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim, to withdraw their agency's support for that joint statement.In that Brussels speech, Mr. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 8:57 am
For instance, four telecoms giants [Ericsson, Nokia, Philips & Qualcomm] jointly wrote a letter to the U.S. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:36 am
This is the second follow-up to the publication of Qualcomm's Ninth Circuit opening appellate brief in the FTC antitrust case, and a direct follow-up to the post on Qualcomm's argument against an antitrust duty to deal to extend exhaustive standard-essential patent (SEP) licenses to rival chipset makers.For a recap, Qualcomm's opening briefsays Judge Lucy H. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 5:53 am
Rader, who stepped down over allegations of being improperly close to a patent litigator, is one of 20 antitrust and patent law professors who also filed an amicus brief. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 3:10 am
Such involvement may be particularly important because, quite frankly, Nokia's litigation skills (and let's not forget that Qualcomm is also an Avanci member) are world-class, while there's light and shadow with respect to Continental. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 6:41 am
Today the court doubled down on Continental by additionally granting Nokia an AAII against Continental AG, the Hanover, Germany-based parent company of the entire Continental group.This is a very significant victory for Nokia's litigation team, particularly its European head of litigation, Dr. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 8:29 am
Eva-Maria Herring (who in the Qualcomm v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 10:51 pm
Qualcomm, Inc., No. 17-cv-00220-LHK, another case involving FRAND, SEP, and related antitrust issues. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 2:48 am
Qualcomm antitrust case. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:46 am
Even Ericsson, a company that just suported Qualcomm's now-fully-briefed Ninth Circuit motion to stay the FTC's antitrust remedies, gave testimony in the FTC case that undermines Qualcomm's royalty demands. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 10:33 am
" (ACT's brief also contains some quotes from the Qualcomm-Broadcom litigation of about a decade ago.)A more interesting point that Qualcomm raises in the duty-to-deal context is that "a 'price squeeze' claim is not cognizable under antitrust law without a duty to deal or below-cost pricing" under the Supreme Court's 2009 linkLine ruling. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 3:32 am
Qualcomm antitrust trial in the Northern District of California. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 12:35 pm
"That's a tight schedule for such a complex case, but the FTC's litigation team has been very efficient and will probably be able to craft a great response to Qualcomm's opening brief in the eight weeks they will have.This schedule slightly increases Qualcomm's chances of obtaining a partial stay of enforcement while the appellate proceedings are ongoing. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 2:18 am
Qualcomm antitrust and FRAND trial in San Diego. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:15 am
The public feuding between the two federal antitrust enforcement agencies about how to resolve a case litigated by one them was a remarkable spectacle. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 11:24 am
And even if the appeal surprisingly took longer, anything that happens as a result of a decision that is being appealed would hardly serve as a FRAND benchmark in any other litigation. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:23 am
Qualcomm antitrust ruling came down that same week.Of all the cases I've watched since I started this blog nearly a decade ago, what went wrong in this Munich case makes it the worst non-standard-essential patent case by a wide margin, just like the district court's Oracle v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:51 am
Qualcomm (Judge Lucy H. [read post]
