Search for: "Quick v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 5,445
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2023, 6:33 am
In R.B. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:23 am
U.S. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 12:07 pm
The SEC’s quickness to dish out fines and commence lawsuits shows its stance on crypto and subsequent crackdown on securities regulation. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Supreme Court’s denial of review in State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 6:17 am
Quick links Sarah AlJourani, Lexology: Sharia Series; void, voidable or non-marriage? [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 3:14 am
Speak to our friendly team on Live Chat for a quick and reliable answer or call us on 01793 384 029. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 9:34 am
In Premier Restoration LLC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 10:55 am
V. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 12:54 pm
Along with the ACLU, we challenged the law and won core protections for internet rights in a Supreme Court case, Reno v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:19 am
Carr cited the Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
The state bears fault for this situation. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 10:56 am
In Cyntec Co. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 10:42 am
Substantial State Interest As usual, the court credits the state’s interest in protecting children’s privacy and physical/psychological well-being. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
” To begin with a quick clarification: the above quote is not Michelman’s own view, but a constructive challenge that he poses for those who are critical of state-centric conceptions of constitutional rights law. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 3:38 am
Over to Léon:"When the Unified Patent Court (UPC) Munich local division handed down its decision in 10X Genomics v Nanostring a little while ago, patent aficionado’s on LinkedIn and other platforms were quick to declare it a historical moment. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:42 am
Which brings us to a quick review of applicable regulatory takings law. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 11:58 pm
Quick links Stephanie Biden et al, Bates Wells: Faith-based Organisations 2023 Update: a helpful overview – especially the roundup of cases. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
