Search for: "Quinn v. State of California"
Results 121 - 140
of 211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2018, 6:17 am
Janus v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 9:51 pm
United States, 91 S. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:35 am
In 2015 in Harris v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:46 am
Quinn (11-681): The issue is whether it is unconstitutional for a state to require home-care providers to pay fees to a union to represent their interests before state agencies. * Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Instead, it doubled down yesterday in a way that I struggled to believe when I saw it this morning: for a patent infringement case in San Diego (Southern District of California) in which Qualcomm stands very little to gain after the judge determined that any damage claims would be limited to a period starting in the spring of 2017, the United States' #1 female lawyer, former Stanford Law School dean and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan name partner Kathleen M. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
Ayala, in which the Court declined to give a new trial to a California death-row inmate. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 6:20 am
., on Friday, April 5, 2019 Tags: Board composition, Board leadership, Boards of Directors, California, Diversity, Institutional Investors, Institutional voting, Proxy advisors, SB 826, State law, Surveys Review and Analysis of 2018 U.S. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 11:34 am
In Harris v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:08 am
Wade, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Wednesday, October 17, 2018 Tags: Broker-dealers, DTC, Ownership, Public firms, Securities litigation, Shareholder meetings, Shareholder voting Mandated Gender Diversity for California Boards Posted by Howard Dicker, Lyuba Goltser and Erika Kaneko, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, on Thursday, October 18, 2018 Tags: Board composition, Boards of… [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 11:16 pm
Corp v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 8:10 am
Richardson, et al. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:54 pm
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 7:27 pm
I know David from my time at Quinn Emanuel and from our work together on The Law of Internet Disputes (Aspen). [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
Quinn did affirm the district court’s decision to disregard primary election procedures embodied in state law, but only in order to comply with the legislature’s prescribed date for the replacement election in the Illinois Election Code; thus, one way to read the case is as saying that if something in state law had to give (both under state law and as required by the Seventeenth Amendment), it should be the primary system, not the legislatively… [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:24 am
Returning to the new Nokia v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:06 pm
LE-1, a Florida Limited Liability Company d/b/a LE-1, a California Limited Partnership, Petitioner, v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 6:12 pm
The Court stated in passing that the counter was required to be at least 36 inches in length, a misreading of the relevant standard.* Boitnott v. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:42 pm
Marvell, who was represented by Quinn Emmanuel, alleged that information relating to prior art that should havebeen disclosed to the USPTO prior to grant was withheld and as such the patent was improperly obtained. [read post]
