Search for: "R. B. vs B. T." Results 121 - 140 of 743
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2019, 11:06 am by Jim Baker
Those efforts have caused me to rethink my prior beliefs about encryption and to better align those beliefs with the reality that (a) Congress has failed to act—and is not likely to act—to change relevant law notwithstanding law enforcement’s frequent complaints about encryption, and (b) the digital ecosystem’s high degree of vulnerability to a range of malicious cyber actors is an existential threat to society. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 8:46 am by Dan Kirkpatrick
Therefore, it is important to know as a threshold matter: a) when someone is a candidate and b) when they are considered to have made a “use” of a station. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 3:58 am by Dan Harris
: Imagine employees A and B. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 3:58 am by Dan Harris
: Imagine employees A and B. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm by MOTP
.--- >  Common-law Account Stated theory revived to lower standards of proof in credit card collection cases and facilitate robo-litigation.The Texas Supreme Court has not weighed in the matter.BELOW: SCOTX AND COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS IN MCALLEN HOSPITALS LP VS. [read post]
22 May 2019, 3:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
To determine how traditional securities regulation applies to ICOs, the four-pronged Howey Test, derived from the 1946 Supreme Court decision in SEC vs. [read post]
16 May 2019, 12:17 pm by Thorsten Bausch
It is true, though, that (good) quality is only one element of customer satisfaction, the others being timeliness, adequate pricing, and achievement of the desired result (grant vs. rejection). [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am by MOTP
That, and any distinctions between commercial vs. consumer credit cases, may create additional supreme litigation opportunities that remain for another day. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm by MOTP
Or is it merely another instance of sloppy treatment of a consumer debt case that is considered a low priority given the small amount in controversy, compared to tort and business-vs-business cases? [read post]