Search for: "R. Grounds"
Results 121 - 140
of 49,600
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2024, 9:30 pm
Kellen R. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 11:29 am
ZRR, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Bexley (2024) EWHC 2073 (Admin) This was a judicial review of Bexley’s contention that temporary accommodation offered to ZRR under s.190 Housing Act 1996 was suitable and its duty was discharged when ZRR refused that accommodation. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:30 am
Canada Ontario Court of Appeals held in R v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 3:02 pm
Southern R. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 12:52 pm
Germany has recognized that the previous model was ineffective and is now navigating unknown ground. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 11:32 pm
Therefore, it is unnecessary to address the remaining grounds of appeal. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 5:30 am
In an opinion written by Judge Don R. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 10:46 am
LexisNexis has selected some of the top “noteworthy” panel decisions issued by the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board during the period January through June 2024. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:20 am
Congress has imposed on them responsibility for assuring that the Board keeps within reasonable grounds. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 4:29 am
Applying those factors, the lodestar was about $8.17 million, which seems shockingly high to me for a case that, as the Eighth Circuit described it, “had barely gotten off the ground before it settled. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 6:39 pm
Conflict situations are one of the most difficult circumstances for human rights. ( John G. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 6:15 am
Craig R. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 7:29 am
According to media science professor Tammy R. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Johnson’s understanding was thus outside of the binary choice advanced by Hayne and Webster and in that sense had more in common with Madison’s middle ground. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 8:58 am
See Parrillo, 130 Yale L.J. at 1339-1417.[1] Nicholas R. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 10:02 am
Louis R. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 1:14 am
Even if initially the three members may have very different opinions, over time and until a decision is reached their opinions converge.[12]Peter R. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 12:10 am
The decision The BoA dismissed the appeal and confirmed the refusal of the application on the ground of lack of distinctiveness pursuant to Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 1:23 am
In assessing the Duffield questions, he determined that there would be harm although not severe, and judged that the resulting public benefit in respect of opportunities for mission and putting the church to viable uses that are consistent with its rôle as a place of worship and mission outweighed the harm to the building knowing that there is a strong presumption against proposals which will adversely affect the special character of a listed building [21]. [read post]
