Search for: "R. v. R."
Results 121 - 140
of 145,069
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2012, 6:46 am
In R. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:46 am
In R. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 1:53 am
R v Khan and others [2009] EWCA Crim 2; [2009] WLR (D) 8 “Where a member of the same household as a child or vulnerable adult was charged with allowing his or her death, the question whether the defendant had had frequent contact with him or her was a free-standing question, unrelated to issues whether that [...] [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 2:55 am
R v Carter (David) [2010] WLR (D) 29 “Where a member of the jury had to be discharged, at whatever stage of the trial, there was no requirement that the remaining members of the jury be directed to ignore the views expressed on any subject by the departed juror. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:21 am
R (A) v Secretary of State for Health [2009] EWCA Civ 225; [2009] WLR (D) 113 “A failed asylum seeker was not ‘ordinarily resident’ within the United Kingdom for the purposes of entitlement to treatment as of right by the National Health Service free of charge. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 2:24 am
R v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 2:24 am
Specific child need not be identified R v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:23 am
R (Al-Skeini and others) v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 10:42 am
Comm’r, _ F.3d _ (11th Cir. 2016), the 11th Circuit held that the Tax Court’s valuation of a conservation easement in Palmer Ranch v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 12:35 pm
R. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
Original Supreme Court decision However, the House of Lords allowed the appeal by a majority of 3 to 2 in R (Bancoult) v Foreign Secretary (No 2) [2008] UKHL 61. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 11:01 am
Comm’r of Social Sec., April 15, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit More Blog Entries: Allensworth v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 2:32 am
R (Huitson) v HM Revenue and Customs [2010] EWHC 97 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 11 ”It was within the permissible area of discretionary judgment of Parliament, and compatible with art 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, to legislate with retrospective effect to prevent taxpayers from seeking to use, by wholly artificial arrangements, a Double Tax Arrangement such as existed between the United Kingdom and the… [read post]
11 May 2007, 2:38 am
R (Johnson) v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:11 am
R (Degainis) v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 137 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 24 ”When deciding whether to make an award of damages, under art 5(5) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, for a breach of art 5(4) of the Convention it was necessary to have regard to the provisions of s 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998 and the restrictions placed on such awards. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 2:03 am
R (Raissi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 72; [2008] WLR (D) 49 “The court was entitled to decide the meaning of a ministerial policy introducing an ex gratia compensation scheme. [read post]
3 May 2007, 2:15 am
R (Dost Mohammed) v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 2:33 am
R (Donnachie) v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 2:45 am
R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] EWCA Civ 1291; [2009] WLR (D) 350 “A convicted person seeking compensation as a result of reversal of his conviction on the basis of new or newly discovered facts establishing beyond reasonable doubt that there had been a miscarriage of justice had to show that the facts had been unknown to the convicted person during the trial process or an in-time appeal. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 2:53 pm
C.A.); R. v. [read post]
