Search for: "R.C.M. v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2007, 12:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 10:48 am
The Maynard case from the Army is probably the most interesting of the six:WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE COMMITTED PLAIN ERROR IN ALLOWING PANEL MEMBERS TO CONSIDER EVIDENCE OF APPELLANT'S ALLEGED ANTI-AMERICAN AND ANTI-WAR VIEWS AS AGGRAVATION EVIDENCE UNDER R.C.M. 1001(b)(4) TO THE OFFENSE OF ABSENCE WITHOUT LEAVE, THEREBY PREJUDICING APPELLANT'S SUBSTANTIAL RIGHTS.United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 3:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 11:11 am
CAAF rejected a Care inquiry challenge today in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 2:43 pm
A CAAF grant in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:42 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 12:11 am
Although journalist and author Walter Lippmann would have appreciated a splintered NMCCA’s unpublished opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:17 am
This week at the ACCA: The Army CCA will hear oral argument in one case this week, on Wednesday, February 1, in the capital case of United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 6:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 12:19 pm
First out of the chute is United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 1:31 pm
One is a short piece by two military judges discussing United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 4:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 10:21 am
KENTUCKY, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), WITHOUT CONDUCTING A FURTHER HEARING ON THE ISSUE, WHEN THE TRIAL JUDGE RULED ON PETITIONER'S BATSON CLAIM WITHOUT EVEN REQUIRING THE PROSECUTOR TO PROVIDE A RACE NEUTRAL EXPLANATION FOR THE CHALLENGE.CLAIM FOURPETITIONER WAS DENIED THE RIGHT TO A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL JURY WHEN THE MILITARY JUDGE IMPROPERLY GRANTED GOVERNMENT CHALLENGES FOR CAUSE AGAINST TWO MEMBERSCLAIM FIVETHE PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE PROCEDURE IN THE MILITARY JUSTICE SYSTEM, WHICH ALLOWS THE… [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
Maurer notes that in one case (U.S. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 2:00 pm
R.C.M. 810(a)(2) and 1203(c)(2). [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:21 pm
The controversy calls to mind last term’s CAAF decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 8:52 pm
A couple of our wise readers noted below that the out-of-date MCM appears to have led the Coast Guard Court to err in its published decision in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 2:34 pm
When United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 5:23 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 7:47 pm
ACCA is hearing oral argument on Wednesday in United States v. [read post]
