Search for: "ROBERT T. CRAWFORD"
Results 121 - 140
of 357
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2012, 7:12 pm
After initially siding with the conservatives, Roberts tried to persuade his liberal and conservative colleagues to converge around a result that would avoid a sweeping 5–4 ruling along party lines, according to Crawford. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:18 am
Or perhaps there’s a smoking gun that explains what Roberts was thinking that hasn’t been made public yet. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 8:18 pm
Or maybe it was something Crawford heard a long time ago but just hasn’t used it until now. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 7:04 pm
From his center seat, Chief Justice John Roberts begins his oral summary of the Court’s decision in the health care case: “I have the opinion for the Court in . . . . [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 10:16 am
I'm sure I've missed folks, included those who shouldn't be on the list, and made other errors. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:21 pm
As Crawford says, we don’t know why Roberts changed sides. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am
Attention continues to focus on the decision in the Affordable Care Act litigation, and particularly on the spate of leaks about the Court’s deliberations, with regard to which Jan Crawford’s initial report for CBS continues to dominate. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:03 am
Crawford brings up her own journalistic scoop — that Roberts supposedly "switched his vote. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:48 am
When Crawford asked whether he would nominate a justice like Roberts, now that the chief justice voted to uphold the president’s healthcare law, Romney answered that he “certainly wouldn’t nominate someone who I knew” was going to come out with a decision that I “vehemently disagreed with. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:35 pm
So far, however, we don’t have any clear evidence against the claim made in Crawford’s story, and at least some circumstantial evidence backing it up. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 12:13 pm
Furthermore, the source characterizes claims by Crawford’s sources that “the fact that the joint dissent doesn’t mention [sic] Roberts’ majority . . . [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:53 am
This was the more provocative, and controversial, theme of the Crawford story. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:11 am
We don’t know if the person who leaked to Ramesh Ponnuru also leaked to Jan Crawford. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:12 am
Clarence and Virginia Thomas After the theory that Chief Justice Roberts' vote to uphold ACA was caused by his epilepsy medication didn't fly, the latest conservative narrative making the rounds (thanks to a "scoop" by CBS's Jan Crawford) is that Roberts switched his vote, buckling to external political pressure, and then withstood a ferocious month-long campaign by Justice Kennedy to bring him back around. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:44 pm
Crawford never says that Roberts committed to a decision on severability. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:31 pm
That didn't surprise me. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:26 am
The supposed “must-read” is Jan Crawford’s report on Roberts switching his vote during deliberations. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:02 am
Jan Crawford reported yesterday that two Supreme Court insiders “with specific knowledge of the deliberations” behind last week’s monumental healthcare decision have revealed that Chief Justice Roberts originally voted to strike down President Obama’s health care reform law but switched his vote sometime after the initial conference. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 7:43 pm
Crawford's piece ends this way: The fact that the joint dissent doesn't mention Roberts' majority was not a sign of sloppiness, the sources said, but instead was a signal the conservatives no longer wished to engage in debate with him. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:43 pm
’” Example 2: “The fact that the joint dissent doesn’t mention Roberts’ majority was not a sign of sloppiness, the sources said, but instead was a signal the conservatives no longer wished to engage in debate with him. [read post]
