Search for: "ROCK et al v. DOES" Results 121 - 140 of 150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2010, 1:44 pm by Lyle Denniston
., the Court will hold a one-hour oral argument in the case of Schwarzenegger, et al., v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am by law shucks
  So how does that warrant a title of “billion-dollar lawyer”? [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:32 am
In 2001, the case of Golan et al v Holder was brought by a collection of plaintiffs, including orchestra conductors, educators, performers, motion picture distributors and publishers against the United States government alleging that Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA)- section 104A and 109 of the Copyright Act - is unconstitutional. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
  One incident that had played a role in the policy change was rock singer Bono’s use of the “F-word” during a Golden Globes award ceremony on NBC-TV in January 2003. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
The fact that the 30 percent expressed their desire prior to the coverage does not clearly invalidate their desire. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
Cullen issued his decision Feb. 20, 2003. *** BE&K Construction Co. (32-CA-9479, et al.; 351 NLRB No. 29) Pittsburg, CA Sept. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Departments establishment of the IDR fee for post-February 20, 2025 disputes and their previous December 15, 2023 announcement of the full reopening of the IDR portal for all dispute categories are part of the Departments’ ongoing response to the August 3, 2023 Federal District court ruling in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]