Search for: "Rather v. City & County of San Francisco" Results 121 - 140 of 192
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2010, 10:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Haskell County Board of Comm’rs (10th Cir. 2009) (citizen had standing because “whenever he visits the courthouse square for [various] purpose[s], he cannot avoid the [Ten Commandments] Monument”); American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:19 am by Adam Chandler
Santa Clara County, which clears the way for “cities and counties to hire private lawyers, and offer them a share of the proceeds, when suing companies for the huge costs of cleaning up lead paint. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
In Lockyer v City & County of San Francisco, the California Supreme Court explained that the regulation of marriage in California is committed to state officials, so that the mayor of San Francisco had no authority to “take any action with regard to the process of issuing marriage licenses or registering marriage certificates. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm by John Elwood
City and County of San Francisco, 14-704, which in addition to the four relists also has been rescheduled once, asks whether the Second Amendment bars a San Francisco ordinance requiring all residents who keep handguns in their homes to stow them in a lock box or disable them with a trigger lock whenever the owners are not carrying them on their persons. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 12:54 am

 Visit Legal Technology
 
 Law.com ®
 10 United Nations Plaza, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102 (800) 903-9872. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 3:18 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  After a license for public use expired and voluntary acquisition efforts failed, the District sought to condemn a portion of the 140-acre Golden Gate Fields racetrack site to construct a shoreline park and segment of the San Francisco Bay Trail, a planned 400-mile recreational corridor that is intended to ultimately encircle San Francisco and San Pablo Bays and provide a network of hiking and biking trails linking 9 counties and 47… [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 8:03 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 298, when a plaintiff has medical insurance, damages are limited to the amount actually paid or incurred, not the greater amount billed by the medical provider. [read post]
The new VMT methodology will not be mandatory until July 1, 2020, unless implemented early by a lead agency, as has been done by the City of San Francisco. [read post]