Search for: "Rather v. Rather"
Results 121 - 140
of 76,484
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2017, 5:23 am
In their focus on the creative artistry of wedding cakes, the briefs that are now piling up in Masterpiece Cakeshop read more like an episode of Cake Boss rather than a typical SCOTUS argument. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 4:10 am
Where a collective bargaining agreement sets out a “board agreement to arbitrate,” the arbitrator, rather than the court, is to determine if the grievance is subject to arbitration Matter of City of Binghamton v Binghamton Police Benevolent Assn., Inc., 2011 NY Slip Op 02109, Appellate Division, Third Department When the Binghamton chief of police instituted new rules concerning the use of sick leave and subsequently counseled a police officer about an alleged pattern… [read post]
4 May 2022, 12:16 pm
“What Alito Got Right: The Court’s job is not to determine which rights we should possess but rather which rights we do possess. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:06 am
The Bilerico Project | Daily experiments in LGBTQ: As I discussed previously, the Glenn v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:26 am
Yesterday's long-awaited Bilski v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 3:21 pm
Rather than reinvent the wheel on the facts,... [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:29 am
Jones v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 2:16 am
Swindon Borough Council v Redpath [2009] EWCA Civ 943; [2009] WLR (D) 290 “For the purposes of an application for an anti-social behaviour injunction by a local authority under s 153A of the Housing Act 1996, the term "housing-related" in that section was to be given a broad rather than a narrow interpretation, so that the [...] [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 9:59 pm
The invention of Bilski v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 12:41 pm
Or, as it will be called on my Civ Pro exam, Pervos v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 12:15 pm
" The opinion in Morland-Jones v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:41 pm
In Bank of the Ozarks v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:54 am
The Supreme Court today vacated the Federal Circuit's decision in AMP v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
Repetti, Boston College Law School, has posted Taft v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 1:29 am
Regina v Rose (Kevin) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “When calculating the benefit to a thief or handler of his acquisition or possession of criminal property, the market value of it was the amount it would have cost him to obtain the property legitimately, or the economic value to the loser, rather than what the thief or handler could get for the property if he sold it. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 1:59 am
Motorist can reclaim cost of hire car after accident Bee v Jenson (No 2) Court of Appeal “A claimant whose car had been damaged by the defendant's negligence could recover the reasonable cost of a replacement while his own car was being repaired even though the cost of that hire had been paid directly to the hire company by the claimant's own insurers rather than by the claimant himself. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 4:17 am
ALJ recommends that employer permit employee to retire rather than suffer dismissal in consideration of his 29-year unblemished service record NYC Fire Department v Gill, OATH Index #1871/10Although the New York City Fire Department sought the termination of Harold Gill’s employment as a firefighter after he tested positive for cocaine in a random drug test, OATH Administrative Law Judge Faye Lewis recommended that the termination be stayed to permit Gill to retire in light… [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 2:04 pm
Yesterday, the European Court of Justice handed down its ruling in Oracle v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:31 pm
From apnews.myway.com: The Supreme Court on Tuesday in Lopez v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 6:44 am
General Motors Corporation v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance (2007) EWHC 2206 (Comm) is a rather convoluted case on whether a consent order, in the circumstances of the case, amounted to an exclusive jurisdiction agreement in favour of the English courts, and whether an application for an anti-suit injunction could therefore be granted. [read post]
