Search for: "Real v. Clarke"
Results 121 - 140
of 689
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2010, 1:44 pm
Islam v Yap and Others. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 1:25 pm
Clark, 491 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), and company safety standards (Steinberg v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
A preliminary trial on meaning due to be heard last week has had to be relisted after actor Noel Clarke disinstructed his legal advisors shortly before the hearing. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 7:26 am
My colleague Bob Clark has just published a very interesting article on legal implications of filesharing in the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 7:26 am
My colleague Bob Clark has just published a very interesting article on legal implications of filesharing in the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 9:49 am
Clark County School Dist. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm
In Perez v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:00 am
In the hearing Lady Hale remarked that it is “always much more satisfactory to think of the child as a real person and name the child”. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 8:07 am
Examples are certainly helpful to explain and to show judges how real scientists reach causal conclusions. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 1:55 am
Lord Clarke noted that the authorities are not entirely consistent as to what is required to rebut the presumption (which is an inference of fact rather than a presumption of law) – whether what must be proved is that the misrepresentation played “no part at all”, or did not play a “determinative part”, or did not play a “real and substantial part”. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm
Judgment of the Supreme Court Lord Sumption (with whom Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Clarke and Reed agreed) gave the judgment of the majority. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
Stout v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:30 am
To encourage consistency across the site and make the sales process as easy as possible for consumers, Amazon encourages sellers to use pre-existing generic ASINs (or Amazon Standard Identification Numbers) where possible.A recent IPEC case, Jadebray & Noa and Nani v Clarke-Coles [2017] EWHC 1400 considered whether this reuse could constitute trade mark infringement and passing off in certain circumstances.What happened? [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:44 am
Penthouse Bindrim v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:03 am
Miranda v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:36 am
Goethel v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 5:29 pm
Div. 2007); Dworkin v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
Dayton, University of Connecticut, and Sharon V. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:17 am
Clark, 2011 U.S. [read post]
