Search for: "Reply in Support"
Results 121 - 140
of 8,818
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2010, 11:26 am
So let's take as an example a case that I've mentioned in a previous reply: Smith v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 3:52 pm
IDAHO STATE POLICE NEWS RELEASE - generated by our News Release ListServer DO NOT REPLY --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IDAHO STATE POLICE NEWS RELEASE ISP Headquarters 700 S. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:45 am
Utah): 2-complaint.pdf 20-motion-for-immediate-release.pdf 46-tribe-motion-to-dismiss.pdf 47-response-to-mtd.pdf 53-reply-in-support-of-motion-for-release.pdf 54-reply-in-support-of-mtd.pdf 73-motion-for-atty-fees.pdf 77-response-to-motion-for-atty-fees.pdf 79-reply-in-support-of-motion-for-atty-fees.pdf 82-motion-to-intervene.pdf 83-dct-order-denying-intervention.pdf [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 7:49 am
.): 9-motion-for-preliminary-injunction.pdf 24-motion-to-dismiss-sheriff-thom.pdf 28-motion-for-judgment-on-pleadings.pdf 36-response-to-24.pdf 38-reply-in-support-of-9.pdf 39-reply-in-support-of-24.pdf 40-reply-in-support-of-28.pdf 43-1-surreply.pdf dkt-49-order-dismissing-sheriff-thom.pdf dkt-50-order-granting-preliminary-injunction.pdf Complaint posted here. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:07 am
.): 14-davilla-motion-to-dismiss-counterclaim 25-emp-response-to-14 28-davilla-reply-in-support-of-14 31-emp-motion-on-damages-and-rules-of-decision 32-davilla-motion-for-summary-j-on-liability 36-emp-response-to-32 37-davilla-response-to-31 38-davilla-reply-in-support-of-32 39-emp-reply-in-support-of-31 51-dct-order-on-31 Prior post here. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 1:02 pm
Now there is a new letter from 30 law professors supporting the... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 6:49 am
.): 58-reply-in-support-of-26 66-us-motion-to-dismiss 68-us-response-to-17 78-reply-in-support-of-17 82-response-to-66 88-reply-in-support-of-66 113-dct-order An excerpt: Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED on the following terms: in accordance with the Gourneau Letter (Doc. 97-1), Defendants shall refrain from approving 638 contracts for multi-tribal, shared services without the approval, via tribal government… [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:23 am
Reply Brief, Harmon v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 12:27 pm
” In its reply, PHH describes the CFPB’s opposition as “completely nonresponsive to PHH’s basis for seeking a supplemental response. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 7:34 am
Tenenbaum, the RIAA has filed a reply brief in support of its petition for 'mandamus or certiorari', arguing that:-Mr. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:14 am
USDC WD Texas Local Rule 7(e)-(f) deals with responses and replies. 7(f) states: “A party may file a reply in support of a motion. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
In his latest reply (available here), Professor Macey, on occasion, appears to be looking a gift horse in the mouth. [read post]
30 May 2012, 9:51 am
The petition for review, answer and reply are available at this link. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 9:41 pm
The Department of Justice has filed its reply brief in the stay proceedings in the Uighur case.This brief is less focused than the government's earlier brief on the risk of a threat from the detainees if they are released to reside temporarily in the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 6:02 am
.): 110 SKC Motion to Certify 112 Individual Defendants MTD 115 Response to 110 116 Response to 112 117 Reply in Support of 110 118 Reply in Support of 112 121 DCT Order Prior posts here and here. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:14 am
.): 5-paradigm-motion-for-tro 8-mha-nation-motion-to-dismiss 20-mha-motion-to-dissolve-tro 21-paradigm-response-to-20 24-mha-reply-in-support-of-8 25-reply-in-support-of-20 [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:15 am
.): 91 Second Amended Complaint 95 Motion to Dismiss 103 Combined Opposition 104 Reply in Support of 95 105 Reply in Support of 100 113-dct-order-1Download Prior post here. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:44 am
The reply is available in the FERC eLibrary under Docket No. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:36 am
.): 72-washington-motion-for-summary-j 74-tulalip-motion-for-partial-summary-j-govt-services-outside-boundaries 77-us-motion-re-govt-services 79-washington-response-re-74 82-us-response-to-72 84-tulalip-response-to-72 115-tulalip-reply-in-support-of-74 117-washington-reply-in-support-of-72 121-us-reply-re-77 Complaints etc. here. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 7:07 am
There is not enough time to begin to address the many inaccuracies, exaggerations and overlybroad generalizations contained in your reply. [read post]
