Search for: "Reply in Support of Motion for the Release of Court Records"
Results 121 - 140
of 206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2022, 6:16 am
” The Court ruled that this response was insufficient and that the statement was thus admitted, explaining: Rule 56.03 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure requires that ‘each disputed fact…be supported by specific citation to the record,’ yet [plaintiffs] cited no facts in the record to support their response. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 5:30 am
In response, Schomp replied: `Jesse, I do not with to have any further contact with you whatsoever. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:11 pm
Newly released court documents provide new details about the investigation into the disappearance of two Kansas women who went missing in late March while in Oklahoma. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
The audiotape of the argument will be released for broadcast shortly after 11 a.m. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Hyatt (1971) 18 Cal.App.3d 618, 624 [where brief fails to specify portions of record supporting appellant's factual assertions, record is presumed to support trial court's rulings].) [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm
The Ninth Circuit held that harmless error review did apply, but that its application was affected by the fact that defendant had entered a conditional plea, preserving his right to appeal the denial of his suppression motion. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 1:39 pm
The Court accepted that the information was false and so ordered its removal, but found that the politician had had sufficient opportunity to respond and so denied the request for a right of reply. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
I replied: "well, you answered my question but you're wrong. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 12:28 pm
Moreover, Plaintiff may, to the extent necessary, prevent the public release of medical records or particularly private information by filing a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) and/or District of South Carolina Local Civil Rule 5.03; proceeding pseudonymously is not the only avenue by which Plaintiff can protect sensitive information. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 6:21 am
Valle, supra.The Court of Appeals then took up the reason the case was before it, noting that, [i]n a thorough and thoughtful 118–page opinion, the district court (Gardephe, J.) granted Valle's Rule 29 motion with respect to the conspiracy charge. 301 F.R.D. 53 (S.D.N.Y. 2014). [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:52 pm
First, the patent owner may submit a reply in support of the previously-filed motion to amend. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:11 am
In a letter that was dated April 22, 2008, the legal bureau of the police department replied to the corresponding FOIL request of the petitioners. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 10:08 am
Unfortunately, a single federal district court ruling is hardly the last word on the topic (indeed, the Washington attorney general office's press release makes it clear they aren't finished with the matter). [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 5:46 am
After that round of briefing concludes (with a response by the defense and a reply by the government), Smith writes, “the Court can assess the parties’ arguments on that record and conduct any further proceedings it deems necessary to resolve immunity issues. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
So the Court denies the motions. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
Even if House Republicans had suffered a dilution of their voting power, the defendants maintain that the vote-dilution theory still would not support standing under the Supreme Court’s 1997 decision in Raines v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 12:58 pm
Senator Mackey July 2022 Release on Amazon Ring Privacy Issues In a recent press release (July 13, 2022) entitled Senator Markey’s Probe into Amazon Ring Reveals New Privacy Problems, not only were serious questions posed to Amazon’s doorbell video company, but Ring’s full response was provided with shocking replies. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:05 pm
Senate subcommittee: Interior-Environment provisions in Senate year-long CR (press release, March 4) Pesticide BiOp is final agency action, 4th Circuit finds, p. 5 ) (click link for more) “Veto” of W.V. mining permit to be briefed in D.C., p. 5 Amended complaint Motion to dismiss Opposition to MTD EPA may have overstepped bounds in regulating mountaintop mining, p. 6 (Opinion) CBD can’t get wolf depredation locations, p. 7 Tribe can’t convince D.C. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
Minor them moved to have the charged offense reduced to amisdemeanor, and the trial court denied the motion. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
§ 646.214(b)(3) and (4), thereby preempting state-law claims of negligence.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Supreme Court of Texas)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief for Constitutional and Administrative Law ScholarsPetitioners' reply Title: Lonberg v. [read post]
