Search for: "Richard v. Internal Revenue Service"
Results 121 - 140
of 171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm
McKinney School of Law; Indiana University Richard M. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:04 am
Richard Baker of [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:56 am
Regulations The United States Department of Treasury held a public hearing on February 23, 2010 focused on proposed new regulations for Internal Revenue Code section 104(a)(2). [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
GRIMSLEY, Appellant, v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 2:30 am
The Internal Revenue Service guidelines for transactions between non-profits and their fundraisers are complicated. [read post]
30 May 2016, 1:52 am
V. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 3:54 pm
In that case, Kaufman v. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
The process of making “quiet disclosures” was based upon a long-standing administrative process set out in the Internal Revenue Manual (the “IRM”). [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:25 am
UK investment firms providing investment services in Italy will not be able to provide such services if they have not received authorisation prior to 31 December 2020, as per the relevant November 2020 communication issued by the CONSOB. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 1:10 pm
Grasshopper House, LLC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
Part 1 of this series examined proposals to fund media content via a tax on consumer electronics, broadband service, or cell phone bills.[1] Part 2 critiqued proposals to impose fees on broadcast spectrum licenses and channeling the proceeds to a “public square channel” or some other type of public media or “public interest” content.[2] Other essays in this series will address proposals to tax private advertising revenues to support public media; expand… [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:45 am
White v. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm
Many less than $50,000/annual revenue. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:19 am
v=lzatElTvT6U. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:16 am
” The press release also stated that the company had terminated Contesse and voluntarily provided the Chilean Internal Revenue Service with the information the prosecutor had requested. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
In January 1952, a former collector of internal revenue for the District of Massachusetts, Denis W. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 10:38 am
–Citigroup: The financial services company officially reports $45.2 billion offshore for tax purposes on which it would owe $12.7 billion in U.S. taxes. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
-based firms (including subsidiaries) with at least $500 million in annual revenues would likely qualify as “doing business” in California.[17] (Insurance companies, which are covered by other separate legislation in California, are excluded.) [read post]
