Search for: "Richard v. Richard" Results 121 - 140 of 12,361
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2010, 10:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Google (reversed 2007) and the district court opinion in Hoffman v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:58 am by Rick Hasen
The following is a guest post from Richard Bernstein, who wrote this amicus brief in Moore v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 11:55 pm by Orin Kerr
Professor Friedman has written up his expert impressions of the oral arguments in one of Wednesday’s cases, Bullcoming v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 1:54 am by sally
Fulham Football Club (1987) v Richards and another [2011] EWCA Civ 855; [2011] WLR (D) 241 “A dispute between a premier league football club and the first and second defendants, the chairman of the Football Association Premier League Ltd and the company itself, was covered by arbitration clauses in the rules of the company and the Football Association. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
There are three reasons why I think the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC is wrongly decided. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
In a recent post on Inforrm, my good friend Dr Paul Wragg sets out a detailed argument critiquing the High Court’s recent decision in Cliff Richard’s successful privacy claim against the BBC (Richard v BBC). [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
In Sir Cliff Richard OBE v the BBC and Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police ([2017] EWHC 1648 (Ch)), Mr Justice Mann reviewed the law on statements in open court, and the grounds upon which the court might refuse to permit them. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 9:14 am by INFORRM
This paragraph of the Leveson Report was referred to in a recent High Court judgment in the case of Hannon v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2014] EWHC 1580 (Ch). [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:18 am by INFORRM
  He appeared in many of the leading defamation cases over a period of over 40 years, including the case of Irving v Penguin Books [2000] EWHC QB 155 and McDonalds v Steel [1997] EWHC QB 366. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:04 pm
University of Chicago law professor Richard Epstein has an excellent column discussing recent development in the case of Didden v. [read post]