Search for: "Richards v. Georgia" Results 121 - 140 of 485
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Content warning: This post contains content that may be upsetting for some readers. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The same blog has a post about the Georgia Appeals Court case of Hartman v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Boyd, University of Georgia School of Public & International Affairs, and Christopher J. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:08 am
Posted by Cydney Posner, Cooley LLP, on Friday, October 12, 2018 Tags: Boards of Directors, Director nominations, Proxy contests, Proxy voting, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting, Universal proxy ballots SEC Sanctions Investment Firm for Inadequate Cybersecurity and Identity Theft Prevention Policies Posted by Sabastian V. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 12:40 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark Earlier this week, media reports circulated that this past spring Google had exposed the private data of thousands of the Google+ social network users and then opted not to disclose the issue, in part because of concerns that doing so would draw regulatory scrutiny and cause reputational damage. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 5:04 am by John Lewis
” The sole authority for this astonishingly incorrect proposition was a Georgia Supreme Court decision, Bickenstaff v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Federalist Society Review, Richard Raile argues that last term’s decision in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 10:35 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Jeffrey Kahn summarized the May 23 oral argument in Georgia v. [read post]