Search for: "Ritz v. Ritz" Results 121 - 135 of 135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2009, 5:01 pm
Ritze convinced eight members of the Oklahoma House General Government Committee to pass the bill (there were three objections), [...] [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 9:00 pm
    N E A R B Y  H O T E L  O P T I O N S   Hyatt Regency Hotel 151 East Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 312-565-1234 *3 blocks from Sheraton   Ritz Carlton Chicago 160 East Pearson Street Chicago, IL 312-266-1000 *12 blocks from Sheraton   Doubletree Hotel 300 East Ohio Street Chicago, IL 312-787-6100 *4 blocks from Sheraton   Embassy Suites 511 N Columbus Drive Chicago, IL 312-836-5900 *1… [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 3:39 am
Unfortunately defense counsel didn't do that in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 1:24 am
In anticipation of this important anniversary, the Committee on Professional Ethics is proposing changes in Articles III, IV, and V. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:32 pm
Wilcox, Opposition No. 91161969 [Opposition to registration of the mark RITZ for art gallery services on the ground of likelihood of confusion with, dilution of, and Section 2(a) false connection with Opposer's RITZ marks for a broad array of goods and services].October 18, 2007 - 2 PM: In re Hotels.com, L. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:08 am
Anyway, for a history of the dispute, check out my original post (and do read the comments), entitled, "Danone v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 11:58 am
If you've been rooting for Aaron Charney in the Charney v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 7:18 am
More fine blogging from Lavi Soloway -- although his latest material is related only indirectly to Aaron Charney v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 12:25 pm
For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision in Ritz v. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 8:20 pm
The case shows up in a database used by lawyers, but as Confidential v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 6:30 am
Supreme Court issued the landmark decision of Daubert v. [read post]