Search for: "Robert Barnette"
Results 121 - 140
of 647
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2019, 8:09 pm
[A quick round up and response to Josh Blackman and Randy Barnett] Tomorrow at 1pm Central (2pm Eastern), the U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 7:30 am
We also contended that his analysis of standing is supported by Part III.A of Chief Justice Roberts's controlling opinion–even if that opinion is in tension with questions asked during oral argument. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:30 am
Earlier in the argument, Greg Katsas elaborated on this theme in a colloquy with Chief Justice Roberts: Chief Justice Roberts, Jr. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 9:40 pm
Only Roberts rested his reasoning on a saving construction of the "penalty" as a tax. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 7:43 am
This is because the "penalty" no longer fits the definition of a tax articulated by Chief Justice Roberts in NFIB v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
In Kersch's account, Robert George and, especially, Francis Schaeffer, are far more important than, say, Robert Bork or even Antonin Scalia, who were, as is true of most professional legal academics, obsessed with techniques of legal interpretation, including, of course, "originalism," which most of "us" tend now to identify as a defining trait of conservatism. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
“The fact that this decision was apparently political, rather than legal, completely undermines its legitimacy as a precedent,” vented Randy Barnett, counsel for the Republican state officials who brought the case. [read post]
2 May 2019, 8:00 am
Covington and the Paucity of Litigation Scholarship," published in the FIU Law Review 13(2019): 599-637 as part of a symposium on Barnette v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 9:02 pm
May 7, 2019 | Robert M. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 6:12 am
Barnett, who filed a whistle-blower complaint with regulators, said he had repeatedly urged his bosses to remove the shavings. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:30 am
Barnette (1943) Frankfurter emphasized that “[t]he Court has no reason for existence if it merely reflects the pressures of the day” and in Dennis v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 9:30 pm
Barnette. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 5:15 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito probed closely on the textual support for and policy implications of Bland’s position. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 12:01 am
Barnette (319 U.S. 624). [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
On October 16, 2018, Robert Tsai, American University College of Law, delivered What Might Have Been, the keynote lecture of a program on the 75th Anniversary of the Barnette decision at the Robert H. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 2:21 pm
The professors are: VC's Randy Barnett (Georgetown), Royce Barondes (Missouri), Robert Cottrol (George Washington), Nicholas Johnson (Fordham), Nelson Lund (George Mason), Joyce Malcolm (George Mason), George Mocsary (Southern Illinois), Joseph Olson (Mitchell Hamline), Glenn Reynolds (Tennessee), and Gregory Wallace (Campbell). [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 11:20 am
(Several commentators, including Neal Katyal, Randy Barnett, and Jeffrey Rosen, noticed close similarities in the analysis, citations, and rhetoric between our article and the majority opinion of Chief Justice Roberts.) [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 5:15 pm
Seventh, in 2012, we had no idea what the Roberts Court would do with the ACA. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 4:34 am
Barnett argued that the enemy lists compiled by a group called Canary Mission ultimately undermine the Israeli cause, and Lila Margalit assessed the effects of the Israeli Supreme Court’s decision in the Alqasem case on Israel’s anti-BDS laws. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 12:55 pm
CNN, The Washington Post and POLITICO summarized Roberts’ remarks, as did Andrew Hamm for this blog. [read post]
