Search for: "Rodgers v. Herring"
Results 121 - 140
of 173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm
Her story will, by now, sound familiar: Her claim for disability living allowance had been dismissed. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Tower MCashback LLP 1 and another, heard 21 -22 February 2011. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:06 am
In HM Treasury v Ahmed Lord Rodger had specifically contemplated that if an order had particularly serious consequences it may be acceptable provided “that it had only a limited life-span and was replaced, as soon as practically possible, by equivalent legislation passed by Parliament. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:45 pm
In Courtroom 1, Lords Hope, Rodger, Walker, Collins, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson will hear Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Tower MCashback LLP 1 from Monday 21 to Tuesday 22 February 2011. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:35 pm
In today’s case (Tang v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
The Court of Appeal yesterday handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
The Court of Appeal today handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am
Her judgment in Yemshaw provides the principal justification for the reams of academic literature that now exists about her (rather than written by her). [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 4:00 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case, Yemshaw v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:24 am
” [28] Lord Rodger could see no reason why Parliament would have intended the position to be any different where someone will be subjected to deliberate conduct, or threats of deliberate conduct, that may cause her psychological, as opposed to physical, harm. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am
XJA v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2010] EWHC 3174 (QB) at [15]. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:38 am
Criminal conviction and disqualification for public employmentRodgers v NYC Human Resources Administration, 546 NYS2d 581The Rogers case involved the termination of a public employee because he allegedly made false statements on his application for public employment. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 4:38 pm
Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
For example, it needed Mr Tomlinson to put Ms Ntuli’s desire to tell her story in the context of her right to personal autonomy and self-development. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm
Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson). [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm
Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson). [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 11:03 am
It's called Qaddura v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
Lord Rodger said: “Article 8 and reputation 37 On behalf of the press, Mr Robertson QC did not dispute that article 8 rights fall within the scope of “the rights of others” in article 10(2). [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:49 am
Lord Rodger delivers a separate judgment, agreeing with Lord Hope but adding observations of his own. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:53 pm
In Robertson v Dogz Online Pty Ltd & Anor ([2010] QCA 295) the Queensland Court of Appeal allowed the appeal of a litigant in person against the striking out of her statement of claim. [read post]
