Search for: "Roger Gonzalez" Results 121 - 140 of 281
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2020, 3:35 am by Florian Mueller
Part of the reason might have been that a motion to dismiss causes considerable delay, but Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers (who is presiding over all those Apple App Store antitrust cases, while Judge James Donato is in charge of the Google Play cases) wanted to put Epic's August 2020 case on a schedule that was basically dictated by the decade-old Pepper v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:18 pm by Florian Mueller
A couple of things that he said sounded a bit more deferential to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, but that's a pattern I've seen in other cases, too: district judges sitting on an appeals court by designation are rather sympathetic to their peers. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 9:50 am by Florian Mueller
It may not be possible for the appeals court to resolve the case on the merits, but at least there should be a reversal of parts of the decision (especially market definition) and a remand (ideally with pretty clear instructions).Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California got the law (Kodak), the economics, and the technology wrong with respect to the foremarket part of Epic's proposed single-brand market definition… [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 10:36 am by Florian Mueller
"What the brief does very persuasively is to draw parallels between how Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers applied the Rule of Reason and the behavior of certain antitrust violators (such as the NCAA in the Alston case).There are some interesting statistics: Epic's ability to show substantial anticompetitive effects was no small achievement. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 2:30 am by Florian Mueller
Apple, where Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers (in the same district) did address the rule of reason in her judgment, though there is a dispute now on appeal--by the way, the Ninth Circuit hearing is now less than two weeks away--over whether she actually weighed the anticompetitive effects of Apple's conduct against procompetitive benefits and whether Apple's "security" and "privacy" arguments qualify as procompetitive benefits. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 1:49 am by Florian Mueller
Then, today and Monday are two particularly likely days for Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers to enter an order on Epic Games' motion for a preliminary injunction against Apple. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 1:00 pm by Brian Tashman
In 2017, Harris County, Texas Sheriff Ed Gonzalez cited the 287(g) program’s $675,000 cost to the sheriff’s office as a reason to end the agreement. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 10:23 pm by binder'sblog
Corruption, harassment, and other derelictions of duty are non-partisan and bi-partisan. 2000 Jerry Johnson (R) (Assembly) Livingston County Attempted burglary 2003 Gloria Davis (D) (Assembly) Queens Bribery 2003 Sam Hoyt (D) (Assembly) Brooklyn Improper relationship with 23 year old intern 2004 Roger Green (D) (Assembly) Brooklyn False travel claims 2004 Guy Velella (R) (Senate) Bronx Bribery 2005 Clarence Norman (D) (Assembly) Bronx … [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 5:05 am by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm this year) may even find it highly dissuasive.Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, who is presiding over the Epic Games v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 7:16 pm by Florian Mueller
It's an arbitrary, discriminatory distinction: while Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers had some serious misconceptions that will hopefully give rise to a reversal and remand, there are issues she figured out pretty well, one of which is that she told Tim Cook Apple was charging the gamers to subsidize Wells Fargo. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 2:45 am by Florian Mueller
" The discovery cutoff date was last week.If the parties can't work it out until then, this issue may come up during tomorrow's discovery hearing before Magistrate Judge Thomas Hixson (who is not presiding over the actual case but effectively handling certain matters, particuarly discovery-related ones, for Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. [read post]
25 May 2022, 7:10 pm by Florian Mueller
I've criticized the terrible mistakes that Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers made especially in connection with Epic's single-brand market definition, where she misrepresented what the Supreme Court said in Kodak as well as what Epic said in the case before her. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:26 pm by Florian Mueller
But it may also just listen in order to obtain valuable insights as it prepares its own complaint.As Josh Sisco notes, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers didn't rule out that another plaintiff than Epic could achieve more. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 5:20 pm by Florian Mueller
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, who is presiding over the Epic case, stressed in the summer that the case could go either way, and while she has more of a track record of letting Apple off the hook (Pepper, and now probably also Pistacchio), I don't think Epic will have to go into that trial based on the assumption that it's all merely about preserving arguments for an appeal. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 2:17 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Darrell West was joined by John Villasenor and Mark MacCarthy to discuss Gonzalez v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 8:00 am by Todd Penner
Mulva 0 269,637 0 100,000 369,637 Sam Nunn 0 276,394 0 46,697 323,091 Roger S. [read post]
16 May 2012, 10:26 am by David Oscar Markus
District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granted a request by 23-year-old Otis Mobley Jr. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:00 am by Tim Zinnecker
(Fall 2010); Susan Kuo (South Carolina) (Spring 2011); Song Richardson (DePaul) (Spring 2011); Rebecca Zietlow (Toledo) (Spring 2011)Kansas:  Laura Dooley (Valparaiso) (Fall 2010)Loyola (Chicago):  Erika George (Utah) (Fall 2010); Juan Perea (Florida) (Fall 2010)North Carolina:  Jarod Gonzalez  (Texas Tech) (Spring 2011)Notre Dame:  Peter Alexander (Southern Illinois) (Fall 2010); Roger Alford (Pepperdine) (Fall 2010);  Margaret Chon (Seattle) (Fall… [read post]
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers pointed to the “tension” between the legitimate rights of patent holders and ruled that the complaint failed to sufficiently explain how SanDisk dominated the market. [read post]