Search for: "Rogue v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 661
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2020, 6:15 pm by Sandy Levinson
 I ask this in the context of the debate about "independent," "rogue," or "Hamiltonian" electors. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:47 am by Peter Mahler
Two of my pet topics — dysfunctional buy-sell agreements and application of federal court abstention doctrine in private company disputes — intersect in a decision issued last month in Ray v Raj Bedi Revocable Trust, Case No. 3:19-CV-711 DRL-MGG [N.D. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Atlantic (via How Appealing), Garrett Epps hopes the court will summarily reverse a “rogue court [that] has had four chances to apply a foundational First Amendment precedent, and has bobbled it each time[:] That mistake, in a case called Mckesson v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On 1 April 2020 the Supreme Court handed down the judgment in the case of WM Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants([2020] UKSC 12), where it reversed the decision of the Court of Appeal and found that Morrisons was not vicariously liable for a rogue employee who posted payroll data of 100,000 other employees on a file-sharing website. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 1:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” — Kristina Littman, as newly appointed SEC Cyber Chief in her 2020 breakout enforcement action, SEC v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 10:00 am by Andrew Hamm
United States and Tennessee v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 1:33 pm by Phil Dixon
Rogue U.S. officer conduct falls within a familiar, not ‘new,’ Bivens setting. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 6:48 am by Will Baude
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court decided in Hernandez v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
Gabriel Chin analyzes Tuesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:53 am by SHG
The basis for the complaint in this case was Bivens v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
IPSO took six months to rule on the matter, during which time a case officer became so concerned about Hindley’s mental state that she sent her contact details for the Samaritans. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am by Patricia Hughes
However, it was also the rule of law that advanced religious freedom in Canada (in the 1959 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Roncarelli v. [read post]