Search for: "Ross Runkel"
Results 121 - 140
of 305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
H/T Ross Runkel. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 5:22 am
- Ross Runkel explains the NLRB's adoption of new election rules [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:35 pm
HT: Russ Runkel via Twitter: Transsexualism is a protected classification under the federal Equal Protection Clause tinyurl.com/c6zbhtj — Ross Runkel (@RossRunkel) December6, 2011 Posted by Philip Miles, an attorney with McQuaide Blasko in State College, Pennsylvania in the firm's civil litigation and labor and employment law practice groups. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:57 am
See also: Ross Runkel's SCOTUS Will Hear FLSA Pharma Sales Rep Case. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 5:40 am
HT: Ross Runkel via Twitter. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:45 am
See also: Ross Runkel, SCOTUS Grants Cert on Federal Employment Jurisdiction Issue. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 2:37 pm
Update: Thanks to Ross Runkel for providing background materials for the Elgin case. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:11 pm
Ross Runkel at LawMemo reports on a Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals case upholding the authority of an arbitrator to consider the issue of collateral estoppel in ruling on the union’s motion for summary disposition. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 5:08 pm
Delia was employment-law-ish enough to make Ross Runkel's Employment Law Memo. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:11 am
Ultimately, I agree with Ross Runkel, "it seems unlikely to have enough political support to get enacted by Congress. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:53 am
Thanks to Professor Ross Runkel for calling my attention to a case decided in my own backyard, McAfee, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 7:00 am
More commentary and resources: "State statutes forbidding injunction of peaceful labor picketing are unconstitutional" -- Ross Runkel's LawMemo "Court Holds Labor Picketing Laws Unconstitutional" -- Metropolitan News-Enterprise "Calif. appeals court sides with grocery store in picketing dispute" -- LegalNewsline [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 5:45 am
For more information on this case, I recommend the following summaries and opinions of my fellow bloggers: Unanimous US Supreme Court: Constitutional Right to Informational Privacy Not Violated by NASA Background Check – from Workplace Prof Blog SCOTUS: NASA background check is constitutional – from Ross Runkel’s LawMemo Employment Law Blog Supreme Court: Background Investigations on Federal Contract Employees OK – from Human… [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:03 am
Much thanks to Ross Runkel over at Employment Law Memo for posting this quick summary of the NASA v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:47 am
Supreme Court decided to consider some issues that arise in federal class actions:Whether claims for monetary relief can be certified under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2)—which by its terms is limited to injunctive or corresponding declaratory relief—and, if so, under what circumstances.and Whether the class certification ordered under Rule 23(b)(2) was consistent with Rule 23(a).Here's a comprehensive post with cites to all kinds of relevant information from… [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 1:54 pm
You can also find good coverage at LawMemo blog about Employment Law by Ross Runkel. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:44 am
Hat Tip/Additional Coverage: Ross Runkel via Twitter; Randy Enochs's post in his Wisconsin Employment and Labor Law Blog; and Eugene Volokh's post on the Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:45 am
Ross Runkel's excellent resources on Concepcion are here. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 1:43 pm
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics (background of case here from Ross Runkel). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 11:49 am
Ross Runkel — Privacy case to be argued before Supreme Court. [read post]
