Search for: "Rowe v. Register" Results 121 - 140 of 251
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
” Let’s stick with the happy topic of registered sex offenders for just a moment. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 3:33 am by SHG
  Even in its most extreme, People v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
This one is Chanel Inc. v Chanel’s Salon and Chanel Jones, 2:14-cv-00304, and sees fashion and cosmetics company Chanel as plaintiff. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 4:35 am
Take a look and form your own opinion.* Coming soon: a Kit talks to a Kat"Christopher Rennie-Smith talks to a Kat" is the new IPKat seminar that will take place on Thursday, 4 September 2014 from 5 P.M. at Collyer Bristow, 4 Bedford Row, London WC1R 4TF, United Kingdom. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:25 am by Scott Hervey
  USPTO records show only one DUKE mark registered by JWE – DUKE’S PLACE for restaurant services. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 10:33 am by corynne mcsherry
Ct. 873, 890 (2012) (quoting Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 5:17 pm by INFORRM
On Wednesday 18 June 2014, there will be a CMC in the case of Building Register v Weston. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:12 am by R. David Donoghue
  And if that is not enough, come for the judges panel, which includes: Judge Jimmie V. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:40 pm by CJLF Staff
  Mike Luery of KCRA reports that California has an estimated 78,000 sex offenders currently registered in the state, all of whom by law must remain on the registry for life. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:08 am
SKU itself was the proprietor of two registered Community trade marks and two UK trade marks on which it relied and which all looked the same, consisting of the words 'SHORINJI KEMPO', with a row of Japanese kanji underneath. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 11:31 am by Jake McGowan
Then again, I can only speak to this issue from a First Life perspective. ___ Case Citation: FireSabre Consulting, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:59 am by Terry Hart
The Supreme Court a few weeks ago agreed to review the Second Circuit’s decision in ABC v. [read post]