Search for: "Runge v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2010, 11:25 am
A recent case, Jory Magness v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:12 pm
The Amendment’s text reads:All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.This powerful piece of constitutional text has ensured for 150 years that whatever else happens to people at the bottom rungs of American society, whose own legal status in our polity may be doubtful, their children, at least, are full legal citizens of the United… [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 11:03 am
" More recently, in C1.G v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm
They are Snell v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:51 pm
All of this is a wind-up to say that, last week, the Maryland Supreme Court ruled on both questions in considerable detail in an important new case, State v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
SCARFE J.P., R. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
SCARFE J.P., R. v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 12:40 am
ProtonMail trivializes the surveillance state in Switzerland. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 3:53 pm
Earlier this month, on August 5, 2022, in Hernandez v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:53 am
The advantage of this is that it gives the patent owner protection throughout the member states of the Gulf Co-operation Council i.e., Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:04 am
Admissibility of opponent/respondent II's intervention1.1 The present intervention of respondent II was filed pursuant to Article 105(1)(a) EPC, which states the following (emphasis added by the Board):"(1) Any third party may, in accordance with the Implementing Regulations, intervene in opposition proceedings after the opposition period has expired, if the third party proves that(a) proceedings for infringement of the same patent have been instituted against him, or... [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:04 am
Admissibility of opponent/respondent II's intervention1.1 The present intervention of respondent II was filed pursuant to Article 105(1)(a) EPC, which states the following (emphasis added by the Board):"(1) Any third party may, in accordance with the Implementing Regulations, intervene in opposition proceedings after the opposition period has expired, if the third party proves that(a) proceedings for infringement of the same patent have been instituted against him, or... [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:28 am
The law of a state has to be acknowledged as a cultural achievement. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:28 pm
Second, immigrants and their descendants have been essential in reducing the scope of affirmative action in the United States over the last 30 years…. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 pm
So someone on the bottom rung of a drug sale could easily wind up getting the kingpin sentence. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:15 am
“And, although the idea of post-market review of deceptive claims may be appealing to the tobacco industry, the government has made a reasonable determination that, in the context of a deadly and highly addictive product, it would be a virtual impossibility to unring the bell of misinformation after it has been rung. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:36 pm
Glaser, former Assistant Secretary for Terrorist Financing and Financial Crimes, and Sarah Runge, former Director of the Office of Strategic Policy, Terrorist Financing and Financial Crimes. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:31 pm
Despite the controversy around these practices, it has never been discussed at the Supreme Court of Canada, until their recent decision in R. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm
The course will also provide those who intend to practice Climate Change Law & Policy in the United States a better understanding of the rationales for the international, national and state mechanisms adopted to face this major problem.Methodology. [read post]
