Search for: "S G v. J G" Results 121 - 140 of 3,827
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2024, 8:39 am by centerforartlaw
As the subject of ownership and provenance are paramount to the Center for Art Law’s mission, having dominated court dockets as leading art law disputes, the following is intended as a survey of the most highlighted categories of looted art. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by admin
Egilman’s settlement was prudent. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 1973) (holding that Section 6(g) “empowered [the FTC] to promulgate substantive rules of business conduct”); United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
”[10] Fourth, the plaintiffs’ claims were before Chief Judge Nancy J. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
The FDA’s actions led the drug companies voluntarily to withdraw PPA-containing products. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
 Pix credit here The question of the photograph has been at the center of modernity, and now deeply embedded in the reconsideration of the intersubjectivity of the person (and social collectives)  in their encounters with the simulacra of the virtual and its generative consciousness (Jan Broekman, Knowledge in Change (Springer, 2023); Larry Catá Backer, 'The Soulful Machine' Int'l J. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
On 26 March 2024, there was a trial in the data protection case of Harrison v Cameron QB-2022-002468 before Steyn J. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm by admin
When expert witnesses rely upon one or a few studies, which telegraph internal validity, this litigation strategy may provide the strongest evidence against the study’s being reasonably relied upon, or its providing “sufficient facts and data” to support an admissible expert witness opinion. [1] Daubert v. [read post]