Search for: "S O L E Design Inc"
Results 121 - 140
of 346
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL's efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal's 'one-size-fits-all' fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims - ActionAid's unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General USPTO schedules roundtable discussion… [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
” Courts have historically found that the SEC’s antifraud provisions are not intended as a specification of particular fraudulent acts or practices, but rather are designed to tackle the infinite variety of devices by which undue advan [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:05 am
O’Neil’s cancer. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:05 am
O’Neil’s cancer. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Consequently, the expert testimony often feels jerry-rigged, an improvisation designed to get through a tough patch. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
Osram Sylvania Products, Inc. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm
J & L Fiber Services, Inc (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Expert may testify as to technical aspects of direction and control but not as to ultimate legal conclusion: Datatreasury Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
(Live Journal) (Patently-O) (Invent Blog) (Filewrapper) (Article One Partners) (IP Whiteboard) District Court S D Iowa: Delay from stay pending reexam not ‘inherently prejudicial’: Middleton Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
Bunn-O-Matic Corp. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
(not precedential) (Patently-O) BPAI’s standard of review of examiners’ rejections: Ex Parte Frye (Director's Forum) (Patently-O) Judge Rader accuses CAFC panel of ‘bias against non-technical arts’: Media Technology Licensing v The Upper Deck Co (271 Patent Blog) BPAI to HP: Equal protection clause doesn't save claims from 101: Ex parte Haines (12:01 Tuesday) District Court E D Texas: Evidence of litigation-induced… [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
(not precedential) (Patently-O) BPAI’s standard of review of examiners’ rejections: Ex Parte Frye (Director's Forum) (Patently-O) Judge Rader accuses CAFC panel of ‘bias against non-technical arts’: Media Technology Licensing v The Upper Deck Co (271 Patent Blog) BPAI to HP: Equal protection clause doesn't save claims from 101: Ex parte Haines (12:01 Tuesday) District Court E D Texas: Evidence of litigation-induced… [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:35 pm
Cellchem Int'l, LLC, 335 Ga.App. 266 (1), 779 S.E.2d 474 (2015). [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
(IPSpotlight) (Patently-O) (Patents Post Grant Blog) US: Extended missing parts pilot program starts (Patent Baristas) (Patent Docs) (inovia) Costco – Supreme Court, by a 4-4 vote, affirms the Ninth Circuit’s restrictive reading of first sale doctrine: Costco v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
It was actually more directed to the effect of warnings on design defect claims than on warning claims themselves. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:19 am
L. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
LON SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
LON SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
It may be hiding in plain sight in US patent database (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Interview with Mike Drummond of Inventors Digest (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Impact of merger/buyout on prior agreement to not challenge patent validity: Epistar v ITC (Patently-O) (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC affirms in part, reverses in part, vacates in part and remands Linear Technology Corporation v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC: Genetech & Volkswagon – Federal… [read post]
