Search for: "S S v. State of Indiana" Results 121 - 140 of 5,184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2012, 6:43 pm by constitutional lawblogger
Prosecutor, Marion County, Judge Tanya Walton Pratt of the Southern District of Indiana upheld the state's statute prohibiting some sex offenders from accessing social media. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 9:32 am by Burton A. Padove
The widow of a man killed in a head-on collision in Indiana two years ago is suing the Indiana Department of Transportation, alleging the state agency is liable for her husband’s death, due to its failure to properly maintain the roadway. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:18 pm by Todd Janzen
  That case held that the "propose to discharge" threshold violated the Clean Water Act.As a result of the National Pork case and IDEM's new NPDES regulations, the next few years will see many of Indiana's largest livestock farms leave the CAFO program and enter the state's confined feeding operation (CFO) program. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:48 am by LaJuana Davis
The Indiana Supreme Court heard arguments Monday in a class-action lawsuit alleging that a school corporation's decision to end free school bus transportation violated the state constitution's education clause. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 10:17 am
The Indiana Supreme Court's decision Thursday in the case of Christopher Bailey v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 11:04 pm
As stated above, however, John and Bonnie's marriage is considered valid in Indiana. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 6:05 am
Pursuant to that State's mechanics lien act, lienable work includes the erection, alteration, repair, or removal of a building, among other things.The Indiana Court of Appeals recently considered what qualifies as a "repair" under the statute. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
It also violates Indianas newly enacted Religious Freedom Restoration Act, Indiana Code § 34-13-9-0.7, et seq. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:43 am by Barsumian Armiger
The Indiana Court of Appeals recently affirmed the grant of summary judgment in favor of an ophthalmologist in a medical malpractice case based on the Court’s precedent in McKeen v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 12:07 pm
He and ICU are accused of various violations of federal and Indiana state law, including trademark infringement, deceptive trade practices and using Yurko's position at Landmark to advance the interests of ICU. [read post]