Search for: "S. E. R.S." Results 121 - 140 of 179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2020, 11:05 am by Jeffrey D. Lieberman
R.S. 30:123.1(C), 128(B), 136(A)(1)(b), 136(B)(1)-(3), 144(A)(8), 213(B), and 217(B)(5). [read post]
14 May 2022, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Snyder (La. 1972) ("We hold R.S. 14:47, 48, and 49 to be unconstitutional insofar as they attempt to punish public expression and publication concerning public officials, public figures, and private individuals who are engaged in public affairs. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Summary judgment proof showed that neither executor received FFA's notice letter dated January 26, 2010 because the letter was not sent to the debtor's address. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:43 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Both persons have a common residence within the State of New Jersey, or have a common residence in another jurisdiction and at least one of the persons is a member of a New Jersey State-administered retirement system, and both persons are otherwise jointly responsible for each others common welfare as evidenced by joint financial arrangements or joint ownership of real or personal property, which shall be demonstrated by at least one of the following:a. a joint deed, mortgage agreement or lease; b.… [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 10:37 am
Only a while yet and it will be just as rare to have a death of one’s own as it is already to have a life of one’s own. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Snyder (La. 1972) ("We hold R.S. 14:47, 48, and 49 to be unconstitutional insofar as they attempt to punish public expression and publication concerning public officials, public figures, and private individuals who are engaged in public affairs. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
Upon review, the Tenth Circuit affirmed the grants of summary judgment on the dormant Commerce Clause and preemption issues, and the dismissals based on standing and ripeness: [w]e hold that the Red River Compact insulates Oklahoma water statutes from dormant Commerce Clause challenge insofar as they apply to surface water subject to the Compact. [read post]
11 May 2022, 10:29 am by Eric S. Solotoff
“[W]e reject the argument that evidence of all these circumstances must be presented for a movant to establish a prima facie case of cohabitation . . . the statute does not contain the alpha and omega of what ultimately persuades a court that a supported spouse is cohabitating. [read post]