Search for: "S. Stokes"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,525
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
In a new article, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen argue that the answer is yes because “essentially all the evidence concerning the original textual meaning of Section Three . . . points in the same direction . . . . [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am
(It also depends on whether legislatures can rescind their ratifications, as some may have done; for more on that, see Michael Stokes Paulsen's General Theory of Article V.) [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm
[A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen ] Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote a new draft article, titled Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 12:01 pm
Ramsey's characterization of "intuitive assessments" of modern needs suggests this as well--this isn't "interpretation," it's "intuition. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 11:25 am
The specific theme for our 2024 conference centers on demanding justice in the face of a wide-ranging right-wing populism that has stoked palpable if not overt hostility toward critical ideas. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The sentence, the lengthiest among hundreds arising from the attack on the Capitol, is a reflection of prosecutors’ evidence that the Proud Boys, helmed by Tarrio, played the most pivotal role in stoking the violent breach of police lines and the Capitol itself. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Michael McConnell, Sam Bray, and I recently completed and posted the 2023 online supplement to our constitutional law casebook: The Constitution of the United States. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 2:18 am
Abed Khalife planted fake bombs at a military base to stoke fears of a terrorist attack. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 11:44 pm
It’s like dicta. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 2:41 pm
But it may be the price we have to pay for Section 3's failure to distinguish between just and unjust rebellions against authority. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:06 am
But we recently made an exception for a long conversation with my former professor, and Paulsen's former law-school roommate, Akhil Amar. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 3:51 am
Without regard to whether you accept or reject the argument proffered by Will Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen, or even Larry Tribe and Judge Luttig, it leaves many questions unanswered. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
The recent wave of demand letters, lawsuits and public clashes continue to stoke stakeholder divisions and draw scrutiny to board and management decision making. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
The recent wave of demand letters, lawsuits and public clashes continue to stoke stakeholder divisions and draw scrutiny to board and management decision making. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:09 am
Once the team began deploying, government-controlled media publicized the names of its observers from neighboring African countries, alleging falsely that they had “clandestine motives” and planned to “stoke tensions,” and that they previously had subverted constitutional government in their own home countries. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 8:35 am
From today's Fifth Circuit decision in Bailey v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:32 pm
That’s a classic understanding of an insurrection or rebellion against the authority of the United States…” [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am
The authors are two highly conservative, leading legal scholars, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 9:14 am
So there's that. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
Ross Douthat has waded into the Section Three conversation, siding with Eric Segall against his fellow conservatives Will Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
