Search for: "S. v. D."
Results 121 - 140
of 68,661
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2014, 10:09 am
Agler v. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 11:51 am
In Gonzalez v Pena, 2016 WL 3654283 (D. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 1:29 am
Atkinson v Supreme Court of Cyprus; Binnington v Supreme Court of Cyprus [2009] WLR (D) 193 “A trial was the legal process whereby guilt or innocence was to be decided and which resulted in a final determination. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:37 am
Moran v Manchester City Council; Richards v Ipswich Borough Council [2008] EWCA Civ 378; [2008] WLR (D) 112 “A women's refuge was accommodation which, having regard to various factors, it could be reasonable for women to continue to occupy. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 3:30 am
Generics (UK) Ltd and others v H Lundbeck A/S [2009] WLR (D) 68 “A claim for revocation on the ground of insufficiency of a patent in which claims 1 and 3 were to a product consisting of a single chemical compound and claim 6 was to a process for preparing it failed. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 10:41 am
Ali v Birmingham City Council; Ibrahim v Birmingham City Council [2008] EWCA Civ 1228; [2008] WLR (D) 349 “A local housing authority’s discharge of its statutory duty to rehouse a homeless person in priority need where that person had refused an offer of suitable accommodation could not be challenged other than by administrative review subject appeal to the county court, which was the equivalent of judicial review rather than a full rehearing… [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 3:06 am
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform v Seager; Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform v Blatch [2009] EWCA Crim 1303; [2009] WLR (D) 215 “Where a confiscation order was made pursuant to s 71 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 or s 6(4) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 against a defendant in [...] [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 2:06 am
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform v Seager; Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform v Blatch [2009] EWCA Crim 1303; [2009] WLR (D) 220 “Where a confiscation order was made pursuant to s 71 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 or s 6(4) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 against a defendant in [...] [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 9:59 pm
District Court Adopts Magistrate's Conclusion of Invalidity under § 101 and Grants Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts By Donald Zuhn -- Last month, in Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:41 am
Regina v H(J); Regina v Ferris; Same v W(A); Same v Walker; Same v Dan; Same v S(C); Same v Robertson; Same v P(M) [2011] EWCA Crim 2753; [2011] WLR (D) 342 “In principle, in historic or cold cases, a defendant had to be sentenced in accordance with the sentencing regime applicable at the date of sentence. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 6:03 pm
According to this press release: Tomorrow, Wednesday, June 20—the one year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dukes v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:37 am
R v Geary [2010] WLR (D) 228 “The offence under s 328(1) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 of entering into or becoming concerned in an arrangement which a person knew or suspected facilitated the acquisition, retention, use or control of criminal property by or on behalf of another person, applied to property which was criminal at the time when the arrangement attached to it, and did not extend to property which was originally legitimate but became criminal only as… [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 3:38 am
Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc., 481 F.Supp.2d 439 (D. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 12:25 pm
” (Prima Paint v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:12 am
Sharif v Camden London Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 463; [2011] WLR (D) 148“A local housing authority’s duty under section 193(2) of the Housing Act 1996 to secure that accommodation was available for occupation by a homeless applicant was not discharged by providing two self-contained flats with no shared communal living areas, one for occupation by the applicant and her sister and the other for occupation by her father, because such accommodation was not… [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 8:45 pm
Bernie D. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 11:30 am
Posted by D. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 11:30 am
Posted by D. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 1:38 am
Day and another v Hosebay Ltd; Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Lexgorge Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 748; [2010] WLR (D) 168 “A ‘building designed or adapted for living in’ was a ‘house … reasonably so called’ within s 2(1) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 if it was constructed as a house for single occupation and the result of the most recent works which altered the building, assessed objectively, was that the property had been adapted… [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:23 pm
Remember the V Bar, also located in Las Vegas? [read post]
