Search for: "S. v. D."
Results 121 - 140
of 62,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2008, 10:41 am
Ali v Birmingham City Council; Ibrahim v Birmingham City Council [2008] EWCA Civ 1228; [2008] WLR (D) 349 “A local housing authority’s discharge of its statutory duty to rehouse a homeless person in priority need where that person had refused an offer of suitable accommodation could not be challenged other than by administrative review subject appeal to the county court, which was the equivalent of judicial review rather than a full rehearing… [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 9:59 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 3:06 am
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform v Seager; Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform v Blatch [2009] EWCA Crim 1303; [2009] WLR (D) 215 “Where a confiscation order was made pursuant to s 71 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 or s 6(4) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 against a defendant in [...] [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 2:06 am
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform v Seager; Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform v Blatch [2009] EWCA Crim 1303; [2009] WLR (D) 220 “Where a confiscation order was made pursuant to s 71 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 or s 6(4) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 against a defendant in [...] [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:08 pm
The post D. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:23 pm
Remember the V Bar, also located in Las Vegas? [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:41 am
Regina v H(J); Regina v Ferris; Same v W(A); Same v Walker; Same v Dan; Same v S(C); Same v Robertson; Same v P(M) [2011] EWCA Crim 2753; [2011] WLR (D) 342 “In principle, in historic or cold cases, a defendant had to be sentenced in accordance with the sentencing regime applicable at the date of sentence. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 6:03 pm
According to this press release: Tomorrow, Wednesday, June 20—the one year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dukes v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:37 am
R v Geary [2010] WLR (D) 228 “The offence under s 328(1) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 of entering into or becoming concerned in an arrangement which a person knew or suspected facilitated the acquisition, retention, use or control of criminal property by or on behalf of another person, applied to property which was criminal at the time when the arrangement attached to it, and did not extend to property which was originally legitimate but became criminal only as… [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 12:25 pm
” (Prima Paint v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:12 am
Sharif v Camden London Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 463; [2011] WLR (D) 148“A local housing authority’s duty under section 193(2) of the Housing Act 1996 to secure that accommodation was available for occupation by a homeless applicant was not discharged by providing two self-contained flats with no shared communal living areas, one for occupation by the applicant and her sister and the other for occupation by her father, because such accommodation was not… [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 11:30 am
Posted by D. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 8:45 pm
Bernie D. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 11:30 am
Posted by D. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 9:55 am
In Cheeks v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 1:38 am
Day and another v Hosebay Ltd; Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Lexgorge Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 748; [2010] WLR (D) 168 “A ‘building designed or adapted for living in’ was a ‘house … reasonably so called’ within s 2(1) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 if it was constructed as a house for single occupation and the result of the most recent works which altered the building, assessed objectively, was that the property had been adapted… [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 12:15 am
In Cress v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:40 am
Jan D. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:09 am
CMCS Common Market Commercial Services AVV v Taylor; Taylor v Stoutt and others [2011] EWHC 324 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 57 “There was no difference in principle between the ambit of a solicitor’s duty to the court in relation to the conduct and supervision of disclosure of documents and the conduct and supervision of any redaction of disclosable doccuments prior to inspection. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 4:28 am
R v Rochford; [2010] WLR (D) 220 “A failure by a defendant to comply with the requirements of ss 5(5) and 6A of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 to provide a defence statement containing the general nature of his defence, did not constitute a contempt of court and was only punishable with sanctions specified in s 11 of the 1996 Act, of a court or other party being permitted to make comment on that failure, or the court or jury being permitted to… [read post]
