Search for: "S.O." Results 121 - 140 of 161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2019, 6:30 am by Pooja Lasi
The Framework Health professionals in Ontario are governed by the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c. 18 (“Act”), the Health Professions Procedural Code (“Code”), and their own College’s legislation, bylaws, and rules. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:43 am by Camille Milner
’” If you communicate your wishes in an open and honest way and your S.O. respects that, you’re very likely on the road to a solid relationship, Kessler added. 3. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 7:49 am by Michael Connell
This decision confirms once again that while the Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993, S.O. 1993, c.28 (“EBR”) creates a private right of appeal for ECAs (and other environmental approvals), the Act’s “leave to appeal” test is a significant hurdle for any would-be appellant. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Antonin Pribetic
Justice Perell of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice considered whether the Khan Resources decision applied to the plaintiff’s motion for substituted service on the Defendants Stéphane Roy [“Roy”], and Riadh Ben Aïssa [“Aïssa”], both Quebec residents, in a proposed class action under the Ontario Class Proceedings Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:26 am by Dianne Saxe
Does this contravene the preamble to Ontario’s Environmental Bill of Rights,1993, S.O. 1993, ch. 28: “The people of Ontario have a right to a healthful environment”? [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 5:06 pm by umbrella
A municipality’s duty of repair and the ordinary reasonable driver standard A municipality’s duty to keep highways “in a state of repair that is reasonable in the circumstances, including the character and location of the highway” is found in Section 44 of the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001 c. 25. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Thus, the Plaintiff satisfied four parts of the five-part test for certification under s. 5(1) of the Class Proceedings Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c. 6 (the “Act”). [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
Catch up with the latest developments in the IP world with the new edition of Never Too Late! [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
Catch up with the latest developments in the IP world with the new edition of Never Too Late! [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:38 am
The 222nd edition of Never Too Late is out now, and relates to posts published in the week beginning 6 May! [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
Full house for this edition of Never Too Late! [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
The Legal Aid Services Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c. 26, ended LSUC’s ownership and operation of the Ontario Legal Aid Plan, and in its place established Legal Aid Ontario (LAO), as a corporation without share capital, “independent from, but accountable to the Government of Ontario,” as set out in the Act (s. 3(4)). [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
The law of Defamation continues to be one of the most technical areas of law, with special limitation periods, notice pre-conditions to the commencement of proceedings, special rules of pleading and evidence, and reverse onuses of proof. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 5:34 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
Justice Perell of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice considered whether the Khan Resources decision applied to the plaintiff’s motion for substituted service on the Defendants Stéphane Roy [“Roy”], and Riadh Ben Aïssa [“Aïssa”], both Quebec residents, in a proposed class action under the Ontario Class Proceedings Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 3:50 pm
C-29, s. 3(1)(b));[2] · the declared parent may register the child in school; and, · the declared parent may assert her rights under various laws such as the Health Care Consent Act, 1996, S.O. 1996, c. 2, Sched. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 4:31 am by SJM
Für den Beginn der Verjährungsfrist des neu entstandenen Unterlassungsanspruchs ist auf den Zeitpunkt der Zuwiderhandlung abzustellen (s.o.). [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 6:51 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
” Then, after the arbitration had been launched, and for the purposes of the arbitration itself, they entered into another agreement which stated: “The decision of the arbitrators shall be subject to appeal in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c. 17 as amended, or any successor Act. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 3:00 am by Dianne Saxe
 16.1, 32, 84, 91; Crown Forest Sustainability Act, 1994, S.O. 1994, c. [read post]