Search for: "SANTANA V. STATE"
Results 121 - 140
of 202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2014, 5:15 am
United States). [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:17 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:04 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
In Copeland v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm
United States, Berghuis v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 3:56 am
A federal court in New York refused to dismiss his race discrimination claims, find that the disparate assignments and discipline supported an inference of bias (Santana v City of Ithaca). [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
Young, 13-95 (asking whether a state can forfeit application of the Stone v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am
Sims, 12-1217, and the trio of state-on-top habeas cases, Ryan v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
Young 13-95Issue: (1) Whether the state forfeits an argument that Stone v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm
Sims 12-1217 Issue: (1) Whether the “hot pursuit” doctrine articulated in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, 12-1269; and Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Young 13-95Issue: (1) Whether the state forfeits an argument that Stone v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
[1] The quoted phrases are from the Third Circuit in Drax v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:46 am
Cruz Santana, No. 03 CV 6299(JG), 2005 WL 67094, at *8 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 6:53 am
Cruz Santana, No. 03 CV 6299(JG), 2005 WL 67094, at *8 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
Santana in 2006, essential allegations are generally determined by the statute defining the crime. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:49 am
In Ermini v Vittori, 2013 WL 1703590 (S.D.N.Y.) [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:46 am
In Broca v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:00 pm
” Following this line of reasoning, the High Court later stated in U.S. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:50 am
” Following this line of reasoning, the High Court later stated in U.S. v. [read post]
