Search for: "SB v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2020, 5:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 8:52 am
On May 13, 2022, in Crest v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 12:49 pm
[Loving v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 9:32 pm
Christina Waugh and Michelle Davis won in State v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:00 am
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has vetoed SB 1370, which was enacted in response to a 1999 federal court ruling (Lett v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 7:14 pm
Third, citing Miami Herald v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 10:04 am
SB Diversified Products, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:33 pm
Second, the district court never enjoined the provision of SB 1070 that announced the state’s intention to make “attrition through enforcement” the policy of the state. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 9:34 am
South Carolina’s 6-week abortion ban has faced several legal challenges since its inception after Roe v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
Rogers case (DUVAL MOTORS CO. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 10:25 am
The adoption of SB 1137 affirms the District Court’s ruling in Lam v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
On April 27, we are going to court to put an end to SB 7066 for good.In this case, Jones v. [read post]
Montana Supreme Court Upholds Preliminary Injunction Against Ban on Gender Affirming Care for Minors
17 Dec 2024, 4:00 am
In Cross v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 8:14 pm
The post Podcast on United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:42 am
Check out the Ninth Circuit's opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:28 pm
Phelps and New York Times v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 8:47 am
On May 31, 2021, the Illinois legislature passed SB 672, a bill that amends the Illinois Freedom to Work Act, the state’s non-compete statute. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Cedar Park Assembly of God of Kirkland, Washington v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 9:29 am
In Fund Texas Choice v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 11:53 am
United States [transcript, PDF; JURIST report] to determine whether Arizona's controversial immigration law [SB 1070 materials; JURIST news archive] is preempted by federal law. [read post]
