Search for: "SEAL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" Results 121 - 140 of 345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2012, 8:56 am by paperstreet
United States: “Great cases like hard cases make bad law. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 4:21 am by SHG
Tomorrow, the first Monday in October, begins the new term of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
That agency is the Federal Reserve, the central bank of the United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
  The ITC complaint procedure is a favorite tactic by parties because in a relatively short amount of time, usually in a year or less, the ITC can issue exclusion orders which prohibit infringing products from entering the United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
 That is the case, now usually called United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am by John Mikhail
”  This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 2:16 pm by Courtney Minick
Appeals from there may be submitted to the Supreme Court of the United States, under seal. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 9:09 pm
Post 239 discussed America's founding contradiction. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:16 am by Larry
In this case, the United States of America is pursuing Ms. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 12:16 pm
United States of America, 276 F.2d 914 (9th Cir. 1960) (citing United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 8:08 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
As we previously reported, the fate of the DACA program now rests in Judge Hanen’s hands, who is currently presiding over a lawsuit filed by the State of Texas along with seven other states (State of Texas, et al., v. the United States of America, et al.). [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 6:51 am
                The Court next considered the issue of whether an individual could invoke the rights of the Geneva Conventions in a civil action against the United States in light of Section 5 of the MCA, which provides that: No person may invoke the Geneva Conventions or any protocols thereto in any habeas corpus or other civil action or proceeding… [read post]