Search for: "SEC v. Smart" Results 121 - 135 of 135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2009, 2:26 am
 And the SEC took us up on that offer in the  recent AFSCME v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 6:00 am
We don't know what that title means; we just wanted to draw some mathematicians to our blog.Well, no.Actually, we just read United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 11:04 am
But the world seems to have overlooked the implications of Thomson v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 8:42 pm
This is why you like to see incredibly smart people -- sometimes academics, even -- appointed to the Court of Appeals.It's an erudite, comprehensive, and incredibly good opinion. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 5:11 am by David G. Badertscher
This development follows a recent problematic decision by the 2nd Circuit in AFSCME v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:10 am
This development follows a recent problematic decision by the 2nd Circuit in AFSCME v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
Accessory: One who aids, counsels, procures, or com ­mands the deed perpetrated, or contributes in a sec ­ondary way, who may or may not be present at the action, before, during or after a crime. [read post]